[003]
youngstormlord
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
->\\\"it contains ideas Lind never expressed, so it\\\'s still a defamatory lie anyway.\\\"
Oh, I guess you didn\\\'t actually watch the speech. The one in 2002. Ok then. Watch it! My summation is accurate.
->\\\"Once again, for the record, I don\\\'t agree with Lind\\\'s politics myself, but the basic minimum of honesty is not to lie about them when one discusses them.\\\"
You show your disagreement rather oddly. And I didn\\\'t lie. I just saved you 45 minutes of victim blaming and Holocaust apologia. Watch the video. Listen to his speech.
You are doing the same thing you do when you defend Victoria. I am warning you. Starting right now, I am removing all the WeaselWords / FromACertainPointOfView tropes you put into that page.
I am calling your bluff. If you are going to defend Victoria by claiming that certain things do not show in the text, then I am going to remove all the tropes that really do not show up in the text as written.
Oh, I guess you didn\\\'t actually watch the speech. The one in 2002. Ok then. Watch it! My summation is accurate.
->\\\"Once again, for the record, I don\\\'t agree with Lind\\\'s politics myself, but the basic minimum of honesty is not to lie about them when one discusses them.\\\"
You show your disagreement rather oddly. And I didn\\\'t lie. I just saved you 45 minutes of victim blaming and Holocaust apologia. Watch the video. Listen to his speech.
You are doing the same thing you do when you defend Victoria. I am warning you. Starting right now, I am removing all the WeaselWords / FromACertainPointOfView tropes you put into that page.
I am calling your bluff. If you are going to defend Victoria by claiming that certain things do not show in the text, then I am going to remove all the tropes that really do not show up in the text as written.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"it contains ideas Lind never expressed, so it\\\'s still a defamatory lie anyway.\\\" Oh, I guess you didn\\\'t actually watch the speech. The one in 2002. Ok then. Watch it! My summation is accurate.
\\\"Once again, for the record, I don\\\'t agree with Lind\\\'s politics myself, but the basic minimum of honesty is not to lie about them when one discusses them.\\\" You show your disagreement rather oddly. And I didn\\\'t lie. I just saved you 45 minutes of victim blaming and Holocaust apologia. Watch the video. Listen to his speech.
You are doing the same thing you do when you defend Victoria. I am warning you. Starting right now, I am removing all the WeaselWords / FromACertainPointOfView tropes you put into that page.
I am calling your bluff. If you are going to defend Victoria by claiming that certain things do not show in the text, then I am going to remove all the tropes that really do not show up in the text as written.
\\\"Once again, for the record, I don\\\'t agree with Lind\\\'s politics myself, but the basic minimum of honesty is not to lie about them when one discusses them.\\\" You show your disagreement rather oddly. And I didn\\\'t lie. I just saved you 45 minutes of victim blaming and Holocaust apologia. Watch the video. Listen to his speech.
You are doing the same thing you do when you defend Victoria. I am warning you. Starting right now, I am removing all the WeaselWords / FromACertainPointOfView tropes you put into that page.
I am calling your bluff. If you are going to defend Victoria by claiming that certain things do not show in the text, then I am going to remove all the tropes that really do not show up in the text as written.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"it contains ideas Lind never expressed, so it\\\'s still a defamatory lie anyway.\\\" Oh, I guess you didn\\\'t actually watch the speech. The one in 2002. Ok then. Watch it! My summation is accurate.
\\\"Once again, for the record, I don\\\'t agree with Lind\\\'s politics myself, but the basic minimum of honesty is not to lie about them when one discusses them.\\\" You show your disagreement rather oddly. And I didn\\\'t lie. I just saved you 45 minutes of victim blaming and Holocaust apologia. Watch the video. Listen to his speech.
You are doing the same thing you do when you defend Victoria. I am warning you. Starting right now, I am removing all the WeaselWords tropes you put into that page. All those that do not show up in text as written. I am calling your bluff. If you are going to defend Victoria by claiming that certain things do not show in the text, then I am going to remove all the tropes that really do not show up in the text as written.
\\\"Once again, for the record, I don\\\'t agree with Lind\\\'s politics myself, but the basic minimum of honesty is not to lie about them when one discusses them.\\\" You show your disagreement rather oddly. And I didn\\\'t lie. I just saved you 45 minutes of victim blaming and Holocaust apologia. Watch the video. Listen to his speech.
You are doing the same thing you do when you defend Victoria. I am warning you. Starting right now, I am removing all the WeaselWords tropes you put into that page. All those that do not show up in text as written. I am calling your bluff. If you are going to defend Victoria by claiming that certain things do not show in the text, then I am going to remove all the tropes that really do not show up in the text as written.
