[007]
Asoktenchea
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
to:
> eifeohfj
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Normally I would say we shouldn\'t remove something just because they are not used/active anymore (since you know, contributions like characters entries are kept even if the character is no longer in the show etc.)... But considering direct comparisons of each other like these are frown upon by the talents themselves, as well as how we can agree that each member are their own person; not a copy of another, I have no objection of them being removed.
to:
Normally I would say we shouldn\\\'t remove something just because they are not used/active anymore (since you know, contributions like characters entries are kept even if the character is no longer in the show etc.)... But considering direct comparisons of each other like these are frown upon by the talents themselves, as well as how we can agree that each member are their own person; not a copy of something/someone else, I have no objection of them being removed.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Normally I would say we shouldn\'t remove something just because they are not used/active anymore (since you know, contributions like characters entries are kept even if the character is no longer in the show etc.)... But considering direct comparisons of each other like these are frown upon by the talents themselves, as well as how we can agree that each member are their own person; not a mere copy of another, I have no objection of them being removed.
to:
Normally I would say we shouldn\\\'t remove something just because they are not used/active anymore (since you know, contributions like characters entries are kept even if the character is no longer in the show etc.)... But considering direct comparisons of each other like these are frown upon by the talents themselves, as well as how we can agree that each member are their own person; not a copy of another, I have no objection of them being removed.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Normally I would say we shouldn\'t remove something just because they are not used/active anymore (since you know, contributions like characters entries are kept even if the character is no longer in the show etc.)... But considering direct comparisons of each other like this are frown upon by the talents themselves, as well as how we can agree that each member are their own person; not a mere copy of another, I have no objection of them being removed.
to:
Normally I would say we shouldn\\\'t remove something just because they are not used/active anymore (since you know, contributions like characters entries are kept even if the character is no longer in the show etc.)... But considering direct comparisons of each other like these are frown upon by the talents themselves, as well as how we can agree that each member are their own person; not a mere copy of another, I have no objection of them being removed.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Normally I would say we shouldn\'t remove something just because they are not used/active anymore (since you know, contributions like characters entries are kept even if the character is no longer in the show etc.)... But considering direct comparisons of each other like this are frown upon by the talents themselves, as well as fact that each member is their own person; not a copy of another person, I have no objection of them being removed.
to:
Normally I would say we shouldn\\\'t remove something just because they are not used/active anymore (since you know, contributions like characters entries are kept even if the character is no longer in the show etc.)... But considering direct comparisons of each other like this are frown upon by the talents themselves, as well as how we can agree that each member are their own person; not a mere copy of another, I have no objection of them being removed.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Normally I would say we shouldn\'t remove something just because they are not used/active anymore (since you know, contributions like characters entries are kept even if the character is no longer in the show etc.)... But considering direct comparisons of each other like this are frown upon by the talents themselves, as well as fact that each member is their own person; not a copy of another person, I have have no objection of them being removed.
to:
Normally I would say we shouldn\\\'t remove something just because they are not used/active anymore (since you know, contributions like characters entries are kept even if the character is no longer in the show etc.)... But considering direct comparisons of each other like this are frown upon by the talents themselves, as well as fact that each member is their own person; not a copy of another person, I have no objection of them being removed.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Normally I would say we shouldn\'t remove something just because they are not used/active anymore (since you know, contributions like characters entries are kept even if the character is no longer in the show etc.)... But considering direct comparisons of each other like this are frown upon by the talents themselves, as well as fact that each member is their own person, not copies of each other, I have have no objection of them being removed.
to:
Normally I would say we shouldn\\\'t remove something just because they are not used/active anymore (since you know, contributions like characters entries are kept even if the character is no longer in the show etc.)... But considering direct comparisons of each other like this are frown upon by the talents themselves, as well as fact that each member is their own person; not a copy of another person, I have have no objection of them being removed.
