[006]
Wyldchyld
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I was going to suggest ArtisticLicensePhysics originally, but I half-remembered that there was a discussion about not using those tropes for works where the work\'s magical elements means that real-life science can\'t be guaranteed even when in-universe technobabble occurs. I decided to hunt down the discussion first to refresh my memory, but I can\'t find the discussion anywhere. I\'m therefore fine with an entry being placed under ALP instead of CRF.
to:
I was going to suggest ArtisticLicensePhysics originally, but I remember a discussion occurring about not using those tropes for works with magical elements that can\\\'t guarantee real-life science even when in-universe technobabble is used. I decided to hunt down the discussion first to refresh my memory, but I can\\\'t find it anywhere. I\\\'m therefore fine with an entry being placed under ALP instead of CRF.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I was going to suggest ArtisticLicensePhysics originally, but I half-remembered that there was a discussion about not using those tropes for works where the work\'s magical elements means that real-life science can\'t be guaranteed even when technobabble occurs. I decided to hunt down the discussion first to refresh my memory, but I can\'t find the discussion anywhere. I\'m therefore fine with an entry being placed under ALP instead of CRF.
to:
I was going to suggest ArtisticLicensePhysics originally, but I half-remembered that there was a discussion about not using those tropes for works where the work\\\'s magical elements means that real-life science can\\\'t be guaranteed even when in-universe technobabble occurs. I decided to hunt down the discussion first to refresh my memory, but I can\\\'t find the discussion anywhere. I\\\'m therefore fine with an entry being placed under ALP instead of CRF.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I was going to suggest ArtisticLicensePhysics originally, but I half-remembered that there was a discussion about not using those tropes for works that have a lot of magical elements. I decided to hunt down the discussion first to refresh my memory, but I can\'t find the discussion anywhere. I\'m therefore fine with an entry being placed under ALP instead of CRF.
to:
I was going to suggest ArtisticLicensePhysics originally, but I half-remembered that there was a discussion about not using those tropes for works where the work\\\'s magical elements means that real-life science can\\\'t be guaranteed even when technobabble occurs. I decided to hunt down the discussion first to refresh my memory, but I can\\\'t find the discussion anywhere. I\\\'m therefore fine with an entry being placed under ALP instead of CRF.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I was going to suggest ArtisticLicensePhysics originally, but I half-remembered that there was a discussion about not using those tropes for works that have a lot of magical elements. I decided to hunt down the discussion first to refresh my memory, but I can\'t find the discussion anywhere. I\'m therefore fine with an entry being placed under ALP instead.
to:
I was going to suggest ArtisticLicensePhysics originally, but I half-remembered that there was a discussion about not using those tropes for works that have a lot of magical elements. I decided to hunt down the discussion first to refresh my memory, but I can\\\'t find the discussion anywhere. I\\\'m therefore fine with an entry being placed under ALP instead of CRF.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I was going to suggest ArtisticLicensePhysics originally, but I think there was a discussion about not using those tropes for works that have a lot of magical elements, so I went hunting to see if I could find it. I can\'t find that discussion anywhere, so I\'d be fine with an entry being placed under ALP instead.
to:
I was going to suggest ArtisticLicensePhysics originally, but I half-remembered that there was a discussion about not using those tropes for works that have a lot of magical elements. I decided to hunt down the discussion first to refresh my memory, but I can\\\'t find the discussion anywhere. I\\\'m therefore fine with an entry being placed under ALP instead.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I was going to suggest ArtisticLicencePhysics originally, but I think there was a discussion about not using those tropes for works that have a lot of magical elements, so I went hunting to see if I could find it. I can\'t find that discussion anywhere, so I\'d be fine with an entry being placed under ALP instead.
to:
I was going to suggest ArtisticLicensePhysics originally, but I think there was a discussion about not using those tropes for works that have a lot of magical elements, so I went hunting to see if I could find it. I can\\\'t find that discussion anywhere, so I\\\'d be fine with an entry being placed under ALP instead.
