[002]
HiddenWindshield
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Your original edit claimed that the story was \
to:
Your original edit claimed that Japan would be an irradiated wasteland in the future, \\\"thus making the story impossible\\\" (your own words). Now, you\\\'re correct in saying that nobody knows for sure what will happen in that situation, since it\\\'s obviously never happened before. But that doesn\\\'t mean that we know absolutely nothing. Nuclear plants have melted down before, there have been releases of radioactive material, and all these have been studied. And the scenario you originally described is patently false.
Again I ask you, nay, \\\'\\\'beg\\\'\\\' you, to read up on the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. I would put links, but as we saw, the discussion pages do unspeakable things to [=URLs=]. I think if you just google \\\"wildlife in chernobyl exclusion zone\\\", it will be an eye-opener.
Note: \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'I\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' have worked at a nuclear power plant. Me. Not \\\"a friend of mine\\\" or \\\"somebody I met once\\\", me personally. So, if \\\"works at nuclear power plants\\\" (again, your own words) is your criteria for an expert, then, yeah, by that definition, I\\\'m an expert.
Again I ask you, nay, \\\'\\\'beg\\\'\\\' you, to read up on the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. I would put links, but as we saw, the discussion pages do unspeakable things to [=URLs=]. I think if you just google \\\"wildlife in chernobyl exclusion zone\\\", it will be an eye-opener.
Note: \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'I\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' have worked at a nuclear power plant. Me. Not \\\"a friend of mine\\\" or \\\"somebody I met once\\\", me personally. So, if \\\"works at nuclear power plants\\\" (again, your own words) is your criteria for an expert, then, yeah, by that definition, I\\\'m an expert.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Your original edit claimed that the story was \
to:
Your original edit claimed that the story was \\\"impossible\\\" because Japan would be an irradiated wasteland in the future, due to its nuclear plants spreading radiation everywhere. Now, you\\\'re correct in saying that nobody knows for sure what will happen in that situation, since it\\\'s obviously never happened before. But that doesn\\\'t mean that we know absolutely nothing. Nuclear plants have melted down before, there have been releases of radioactive material, and all these have been studied. And the scenario you originally described is patently false.
Again I ask you, nay, \\\'\\\'beg\\\'\\\' you, to read up on the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. I would put links, but as we saw, the discussion pages do unspeakable things to [=URLs=]. I think if you just google \\\"wildlife in chernobyl exclusion zone\\\", it will be an eye-opener.
Note: \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'I\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' have worked at a nuclear power plant. Me. Not \\\"a friend of mine\\\" or \\\"somebody I met once\\\", me personally. So, if \\\"works at nuclear power plants\\\" is your criteria for an expert, then, yeah, by that definition, I\\\'m an expert.
Again I ask you, nay, \\\'\\\'beg\\\'\\\' you, to read up on the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. I would put links, but as we saw, the discussion pages do unspeakable things to [=URLs=]. I think if you just google \\\"wildlife in chernobyl exclusion zone\\\", it will be an eye-opener.
Note: \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'I\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' have worked at a nuclear power plant. Me. Not \\\"a friend of mine\\\" or \\\"somebody I met once\\\", me personally. So, if \\\"works at nuclear power plants\\\" is your criteria for an expert, then, yeah, by that definition, I\\\'m an expert.
