[007]
Tambov333
Current Version
Changed line(s) 2 from:
n
I was thinking about an \
to:
I was thinking about an \\\"interview\\\": representatives of all Catalysts answer what they think about the lack of MundaneUtility.
Possible representatives, with stock answers:
* Grimm: [[IronMan Antony Stark]] (\\\"Well, I \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'do\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' get to [[{{Superhero}} kick ass]].\\\");
* Hoffnung: [[{{Freefall}} Florence Ambrose]] (\\\"What is our work good for without it?\\\");
* Klagen: [[{{Batman}} Victor Fries]] (\\\"At least it could help [[FreudianExcuse Nora]]...\\\");
* Neid: [[FantasticFour Victor von Doom]] (\\\"It´s all Richard´s fault!!\\\");
* Staunen: [[BackToTheFuture Emmet L Brown]] (\\\"Well, it \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' [[RuleOfCool awesome]].\\\").
Additional ideas welcomed.
Possible representatives, with stock answers:
* Grimm: [[IronMan Antony Stark]] (\\\"Well, I \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'do\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' get to [[{{Superhero}} kick ass]].\\\");
* Hoffnung: [[{{Freefall}} Florence Ambrose]] (\\\"What is our work good for without it?\\\");
* Klagen: [[{{Batman}} Victor Fries]] (\\\"At least it could help [[FreudianExcuse Nora]]...\\\");
* Neid: [[FantasticFour Victor von Doom]] (\\\"It´s all Richard´s fault!!\\\");
* Staunen: [[BackToTheFuture Emmet L Brown]] (\\\"Well, it \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' [[RuleOfCool awesome]].\\\").
Additional ideas welcomed.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Needs an illustration, like the rest of the Wod.
I was thinking about an \
I was thinking about an \
to:
Needs an illustration, like the rest of the WOD.
I was thinking about an \\\"interview\\\": representatives of all Catalysts answer what they think about the lack of MundaneUtility.
Possible representatives, with stock answers:
* Grimm: [[IronMan Antony Stark]] (\\\"Well, I \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'do\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' get to kick ass.\\\");
* Hoffnung: [[{{Freefall}} Florence Ambrose]] (\\\"What is it good for without it?\\\");
* Klagen: [[{{Batman}} Victor Fries]] (\\\"At least it could help [[FreudianEXcuse Nora]]...\\\");
* Neid: [[FantasticFour Victor von Doom]] (\\\"It´s all Richard´s fault!\\\");
* Staunen: [[BackToTheFuture Emmet L Brown]] (\\\"Well, it \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' awesome.\\\").
Additional ideas welcomed.
I was thinking about an \\\"interview\\\": representatives of all Catalysts answer what they think about the lack of MundaneUtility.
Possible representatives, with stock answers:
* Grimm: [[IronMan Antony Stark]] (\\\"Well, I \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'do\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' get to kick ass.\\\");
* Hoffnung: [[{{Freefall}} Florence Ambrose]] (\\\"What is it good for without it?\\\");
* Klagen: [[{{Batman}} Victor Fries]] (\\\"At least it could help [[FreudianEXcuse Nora]]...\\\");
* Neid: [[FantasticFour Victor von Doom]] (\\\"It´s all Richard´s fault!\\\");
* Staunen: [[BackToTheFuture Emmet L Brown]] (\\\"Well, it \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' awesome.\\\").
Additional ideas welcomed.
Changed line(s) 2 from:
n
I was thinking about an \
to:
I was thinking about an \\\"interview\\\": representatives of all Catalysts answer what they think about the lack of MundaneUtility.
Possible representatives, with stock answers:
* Grimm: [[IronMan Antony Stark]] (\\\"Well, I \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'do\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' get to kick ass`.\\\");
* Hoffnung: [[{{Freefall}} Florence Ambrose]] (\\\"What is it good for without it?\\\");
* Klagen: [[{{Batman}} Victor Fries]] (\\\"At least it could help [[FreudianEXcuse Nora]]...\\\");
* Neid: [[FantasticFour Victor von Doom]] (\\\"It´s all Richard´s fault!\\\");
* Staunen: [[BackToTheFuture Emmet L Brown]] (\\\"Well, it \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' awesome.\\\").
Additional ideas welcomed.
Possible representatives, with stock answers:
* Grimm: [[IronMan Antony Stark]] (\\\"Well, I \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'do\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' get to kick ass`.\\\");
* Hoffnung: [[{{Freefall}} Florence Ambrose]] (\\\"What is it good for without it?\\\");
* Klagen: [[{{Batman}} Victor Fries]] (\\\"At least it could help [[FreudianEXcuse Nora]]...\\\");
* Neid: [[FantasticFour Victor von Doom]] (\\\"It´s all Richard´s fault!\\\");
* Staunen: [[BackToTheFuture Emmet L Brown]] (\\\"Well, it \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\' awesome.\\\").
Additional ideas welcomed.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Ironic because the vast majority of people use it in places where it makes sense, (or some harmless subjective idiom). That\'s how became popular. We might as well ban the word \
to:
Ironic because the vast majority of people use it in places where it makes sense, (or some harmless subjective idiom). That\\\'s how became popular. We might as well ban the word \\\"Actually\\\" and \\\"However\\\". It\\\'s easier to find natter by searching that words.
What this troper really dislikes[[hottip:**:In this case I am using This troper to depersonalize an argument]] is folks lecturing on how \\\'\\\'\\\"you should use your name or I.\\\"\\\'\\\' In the face of all evidence to the contrary that it\\\'s a comfortable vernacular that is unique to this wiki. We could ban sentences w/ no subject too.
What this troper really dislikes[[hottip:**:In this case I am using This troper to depersonalize an argument]] is folks lecturing on how \\\'\\\'\\\"you should use your name or I.\\\"\\\'\\\' In the face of all evidence to the contrary that it\\\'s a comfortable vernacular that is unique to this wiki. We could ban sentences w/ no subject too.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Ironic because the vast majority of people using This troper use it in places where it makes sense, (or some harmless idiomatic expression, such as in subjective use). That\'s how it got idiomatic enough to use as an identifier. We might as well redlink the word \
to:
Ironic because the vast majority of people use it in places where it makes sense, (or some harmless subjective idiom). That\\\'s how became popular. We might as well ban the word \\\"Actually\\\" and \\\"However\\\". It\\\'s easier to find natter by searching that words.
What this troper really dislikes[[hottip:**:In this case I am using This troper to depersonalize an argument]] is folks lecturing on how \\\'\\\'\\\"you should use your name or I.\\\"\\\'\\\' In the face of all evidence to the contrary that it\\\'s a comfortable vernacular that is unique to this wiki. That\\\'d be like banning sentences unless they are subject-verb-object. This one, for instance.
What this troper really dislikes[[hottip:**:In this case I am using This troper to depersonalize an argument]] is folks lecturing on how \\\'\\\'\\\"you should use your name or I.\\\"\\\'\\\' In the face of all evidence to the contrary that it\\\'s a comfortable vernacular that is unique to this wiki. That\\\'d be like banning sentences unless they are subject-verb-object. This one, for instance.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Ironic because there is no statistical correlation. The vast majority of people using This troper use it in places where it makes sense, i.e. where use of first person is OK (or some harmless idiomatic expression, such as in most subjective trope use). That\'s how it got idiomatic enough to make its way into Natter. On the subject of Natter, We might as well redlink the word \
to:
Ironic because the vast majority of people using This troper use it in places where it makes sense, (or some harmless idiomatic expression, such as in subjective use). That\\\'s how it got idiomatic enough to use as an identifier. We might as well redlink the word \\\"Actually\\\" and \\\"However\\\". It\\\'s much easier to delete Natter if you google \\\"Actually\\\", \\\"However\\\" and \\\"Come to think of it\\\".
What This troper really dislikes[[hottip:**:In this case I am using This troper to depersonalize an argument]] is folks lecturing on how \\\'\\\'\\\"you should use your name or I.\\\"\\\'\\\' In the face of all evidence to the contrary that it\\\'s a comfortable vernacular that is unique to this wiki. That\\\'d be like banning sentences unless they are subject-verb-object. This one, for instance.
What This troper really dislikes[[hottip:**:In this case I am using This troper to depersonalize an argument]] is folks lecturing on how \\\'\\\'\\\"you should use your name or I.\\\"\\\'\\\' In the face of all evidence to the contrary that it\\\'s a comfortable vernacular that is unique to this wiki. That\\\'d be like banning sentences unless they are subject-verb-object. This one, for instance.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Ironic because there is no statistical correlation. The vast majority of people using This troper use it in places where it makes sense, i.e. where use of first person is OK (or some harmless idiomatic expression, such as in most subjective trope use). That\'s how it got idiomatic enough to make its way into Natter. On the subject of Natter, We might as well redlink the word \
to:
Ironic because there is no statistical correlation. The vast majority of people using This troper use it in places where it makes sense, i.e. where use of first person is OK (or some harmless idiomatic expression, such as in most subjective trope use). That\\\'s how it got idiomatic enough to make its way into Natter. On the subject of Natter, We might as well redlink the word \\\"Actually\\\" and \\\"However\\\". It\\\'s much easier to delete Natter if you google \\\"Actually\\\" and \\\"However\\\" and \\\"Come to think of it\\\".
What I really hate is folks lecturing on how \\\"you should use your name or I.\\\" In the face of all evidence to the contrary that it\\\'s a comfortable vernacular that is unique to this wiki. That\\\'d be like banning sentences that are not SVO. This one, for instance.
What I really hate is folks lecturing on how \\\"you should use your name or I.\\\" In the face of all evidence to the contrary that it\\\'s a comfortable vernacular that is unique to this wiki. That\\\'d be like banning sentences that are not SVO. This one, for instance.
