[001]
ChrisX
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"Brief Entry\\\": Before you get into the folders, there are some brief explanations of what the archetype is like. Like this entry you can find in Bandit Bosses:
* The Gazzak: A StarterVillain and often the very first boss. Likes to prey on the weak. Usually a bandit or a pirate.
* Bandit Twins: [[ThoseTwoBadGuys An eccentric duo]] that may be defending their turf from intruders or protecting stolen loot.
The thing is, amongst the \\\'Noble Enforcers\\\' group, Murdock got none (yet). So we had to build it up after we iron out the archetype.
And now, back to Murdock:
* Fanatically Loyal to their individual leader: Is there a difference between this and Camus?
* Aren\\\'t extremely super friendly to the party: And... neither does Camus? Camus also refused any offers to join. Seemed like they run into \\\"Nothing personal, dude. I just have a duty to do.\\\" So what was the difference again?
* Tends towards MightyGlacier characters: Anything we can symbolize on this? (Maybe an EvilCounterpart to the Lorenz (minus the ridiculous recruitment process)?)
The greatest hurdle of a Murdock archetype is to differentiate with Camus (In case of Ishtar, so far the case was \\\"She\\\'s female\\\", while in the past, I proposed that Ishtar is \\\"Absolutely refused to join the good guys because you made it personal against them, despite their general niceness.\\\", but Murdock... not sure if I could say \\\'heavily armored Camus\\\' could pass. But that\\\'s why we\\\'re discussing.)
Also the old entry removed Shiraham from the One-Shot General into Murdock. My question: Doesn\\\'t Murdocks have appearances outside the battle they\\\'re in? Because last I remembered, Murdock did make cutscene appearances beyond the sole battle he\\\'s in (alongside Glen).
* The Gazzak: A StarterVillain and often the very first boss. Likes to prey on the weak. Usually a bandit or a pirate.
* Bandit Twins: [[ThoseTwoBadGuys An eccentric duo]] that may be defending their turf from intruders or protecting stolen loot.
The thing is, amongst the \\\'Noble Enforcers\\\' group, Murdock got none (yet). So we had to build it up after we iron out the archetype.
And now, back to Murdock:
* Fanatically Loyal to their individual leader: Is there a difference between this and Camus?
* Aren\\\'t extremely super friendly to the party: And... neither does Camus? Camus also refused any offers to join. Seemed like they run into \\\"Nothing personal, dude. I just have a duty to do.\\\" So what was the difference again?
* Tends towards MightyGlacier characters: Anything we can symbolize on this? (Maybe an EvilCounterpart to the Lorenz (minus the ridiculous recruitment process)?)
The greatest hurdle of a Murdock archetype is to differentiate with Camus (In case of Ishtar, so far the case was \\\"She\\\'s female\\\", while in the past, I proposed that Ishtar is \\\"Absolutely refused to join the good guys because you made it personal against them, despite their general niceness.\\\", but Murdock... not sure if I could say \\\'heavily armored Camus\\\' could pass. But that\\\'s why we\\\'re discussing.)
Also the old entry removed Shiraham from the One-Shot General into Murdock. My question: Doesn\\\'t Murdocks have appearances outside the battle they\\\'re in? Because last I remembered, Murdock did make cutscene appearances beyond the sole battle he\\\'s in (alongside Glen).
