[002]
Clanger00
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
At least one reviewer has described Victoria as \
to:
At least one reviewer has described Victoria as \\\"to Paleocons, what the Turner Diaries is to neo-Nazis\\\", based on Victoria\\\'s core plot of revolution against a liberally corrupt government, and the inclusion of some of the author\\\'s paleoconservative views (though peppered with exaggerated caricatures and TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture scifi elements). Though Victoria does not endorse Nazism or genocide against every non-white person, Lind\\\'s novel is generally recognized as polarising and extreme, and often considered part of the \\\"Alt-Right\\\" milieu, though Lind has never described himself or his politics that way.
or:
Victoria has been called \\\"the Paleocon Turner Diaries\\\" by at least one reviewer (referring to the infamous far-right novel by neo-Nazi William Luther Pierce), based on a shared core plot of revolution against a liberally corrupt government. Lind\\\'s novel is generally recognized as extreme, and often considered part of the \\\"Alt-Right\\\" milieu, though Lind has never described himself or his politics that way.
I think the first one is better since the second one just comes off as unfinished. These are just two quick examples of including all or none of what the book \\\'endorses/condemns\\\', feel free to write better versions.
or:
Victoria has been called \\\"the Paleocon Turner Diaries\\\" by at least one reviewer (referring to the infamous far-right novel by neo-Nazi William Luther Pierce), based on a shared core plot of revolution against a liberally corrupt government. Lind\\\'s novel is generally recognized as extreme, and often considered part of the \\\"Alt-Right\\\" milieu, though Lind has never described himself or his politics that way.
I think the first one is better since the second one just comes off as unfinished. These are just two quick examples of including all or none of what the book \\\'endorses/condemns\\\', feel free to write better versions.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Victoria has been called \
to:
At least one reviewer has described Victoria as \\\"to Paleocons, what the Turner Diaries is to neo-Nazis\\\", based on Victoria\\\'s core plot of revolution against a liberally corrupt government, and the inclusion of some of the author\\\'s paleoconservative views (though peppered with exaggerated caricatures and TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture scifi elements). Though Victoria does not endorse Nazism or genocide against every non-white person, Lind\\\'s novel is generally recognized as polarising and extreme, and often considered part of the \\\"Alt-Right\\\" milieu, though Lind has never described himself or his politics that way.
or:
Victoria has been called \\\"the Paleocon Turner Diaries\\\" by at least one reviewer (referring to the infamous far-right novel by neo-Nazi William Luther Pierce), based on a shared core plot of revolution against a liberally corrupt government. Lind\\\'s novel is generally recognized as extreme, and often considered part of the \\\"Alt-Right\\\" milieu, though Lind has never described himself or his politics that way.
I think the first one is better since the second one just comes off as unfinished. These are just two quick examples of including all or none of what the book \\\'endorses/condemns\\\', feel free to write better versions.
or:
Victoria has been called \\\"the Paleocon Turner Diaries\\\" by at least one reviewer (referring to the infamous far-right novel by neo-Nazi William Luther Pierce), based on a shared core plot of revolution against a liberally corrupt government. Lind\\\'s novel is generally recognized as extreme, and often considered part of the \\\"Alt-Right\\\" milieu, though Lind has never described himself or his politics that way.
I think the first one is better since the second one just comes off as unfinished. These are just two quick examples of including all or none of what the book \\\'endorses/condemns\\\', feel free to write better versions.
