[003]
Apocrypha
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Is it just me, or does the {{Narm}} entry seem to be getting misused? Some criticisms, like the awkward GenderNeutralWriting, are valid; some seem like they\'re just stretching to fit the trope. Yeah, Byleth not using Divine Pulse all the time might be eyebrow-raising, but I don\'t think it fits the trope. And some list moments that aren\'t meant to be serious at all (like students and their goals).
to:
Is it just me, or does the {{Narm}} entry seem to be getting misused? Some criticisms, like the awkward GenderNeutralWriting, are valid; some seem like they\\\'re just stretching to fit the trope, and some listed moments aren\\\'t meant to be serious at all (like students and their goals).
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
With all due respect, I feel that you are now being deliberately obtuse. Matters of \'\'fact\'\' are not subject to talk page consensus. Even several fan haters banding together have no right to present blatant \'\'untruths\'\' about a work, and far less to make defamatory postings about authors. To call someone \
to:
With all due respect, I feel that you are now being deliberately obtuse. Matters of \\\'\\\'fact\\\'\\\' are not subject to talk page consensus. Even several fan haters banding together have no right to present blatant \\\'\\\'untruths\\\'\\\' about a work, and far less to make defamatory postings about authors. To call someone \\\"Alt-Right\\\" and not even mention that he does not call himself that can easily be taken as defamation. That is a violation of the TV Tropes Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment, and possibly of real life laws against libel in several jurisdictions. We would do well to avoid that sort of thing.
Now, I at least am not opposed to mentioning the fact that some people associate Lind with right wing groups and causes as such, but only the biased way Terrie wants to do it. I have suggested a compromise for how it could be done in a less incendiary manner, by simply noting the author\\\'s own position on the matter as well.
Now, I at least am not opposed to mentioning the fact that some people associate Lind with right wing groups and causes as such, but only the biased way Terrie wants to do it. I have suggested a compromise for how it could be done in a less incendiary manner, by simply noting the author\\\'s own position on the matter as well.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
With all due respect, I feel that you are being deliberately obtuse. Matters of \'\'fact\'\' are not subject to talk page consensus. Even several fan haters banding together have no right to present blatant \'\'untruths\'\' about a work, and far less to make defamatory postings about authors. To call someone \
to:
With all due respect, I feel that you are now being deliberately obtuse. Matters of \\\'\\\'fact\\\'\\\' are not subject to talk page consensus. Even several fan haters banding together have no right to present blatant \\\'\\\'untruths\\\'\\\' about a work, and far less to make defamatory postings about authors. To call someone \\\"Alt-Right\\\" and not even mention that he does not call himself that can easily be taken as defamation. That is a violation of the TV Tropes Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment, and possibly of real life laws against libel in several jurisdictions. We would do well to avoid that sort of thing.
Now, I at least am not opposed to mentioning the fact that some people associate Lind with right wing groups and causes, but only the biased way Terrie wants to do it. I have suggested a compromise for how it could be done in a less incendiary manner, by simply noting the author\\\'s own position on the matter as well.
Now, I at least am not opposed to mentioning the fact that some people associate Lind with right wing groups and causes, but only the biased way Terrie wants to do it. I have suggested a compromise for how it could be done in a less incendiary manner, by simply noting the author\\\'s own position on the matter as well.
