[003]
EmeraldSky
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Aren\'t RonTheDeathEater entries for fan work pages only and do not belong on canon work pages? I think I remember RTD entries being removed from other YMMV pages for that reason. I just want to check before I delete the entry.
to:
Aren\\\'t RonTheDeathEater entries for fan work pages only and do not belong on canon work pages? I think I remember RTD entries being removed from other YMMV pages for that reason. I just want to check if that\\\'s the case before I delete the entry.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Aren\'t RonTheDeathEater entries for fan work pages only and do not belong on canon work pages? I think I remember RTD entries being removed from other YMMV pages for that reason.
to:
Aren\\\'t RonTheDeathEater entries for fan work pages only and do not belong on canon work pages? I think I remember RTD entries being removed from other YMMV pages for that reason. I just want to check before I delete the entry.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
That would also be fine with me. Which specific example you want to use is beside the point. Among people I know at least, there are plenty who cannot stand Colbert (and probably the majority of those are left of center as commonly understood, though they still hate his style), so I used him. You could take the Borat guy when he plays insane dictator for another. The principle to be illustrated was simply that sarcasm and spiteful humor, however poor in taste, and/or badly received, is not the same as, or as bad as, advocating horrible things perfectly seriously.
to:
That would also be fine with me. Which specific example you want to use is beside the point. Among people I know at least, there are plenty who cannot stand Colbert (and probably the majority of those are left of center as commonly understood, though they still hate his style), so I used him. You could take the Borat guy when he plays at his megalomaniac dictator persona for another. The principle to be illustrated was simply that sarcasm and spiteful humor, however poor in taste, and/or badly received, is not the same as, or as bad as, advocating horrible things perfectly seriously.
