Discussion History Literature / VictoriaANovelOf4thGenerationWar

->\\\'\\\'\\\'Sark:\\\'\\\'\\\' FINISH THE GAME!!\\\\\\\\
\\\'\\\'\\\'Kevin Flynn:\\\'\\\'\\\' NOOOO!!\\\\\\\\
\\\'\\\'\\\'Sark:\\\'\\\'\\\' Kill him! \\\\\\\\
\\\'\\\'\\\'Flynn:\\\'\\\'\\\' No! \\\'\\\'[intentionally drops identity disk]\\\'\\\'\\\\\\\\
\\\'\\\'\\\'Sark:\\\'\\\'\\\' You\\\'ll regret this! \\\'\\\'[derezzes Crom]\\\'\\\'
-->-- \\\'\\\'Film/{{Tron}}\\\'\\\'

...Because I have little idea of what\\\'s going on in the scene from reading this. (Identity disk? Derezzes?) It doesn\\\'t seem like it\\\'s a particularly witty or interesting quote anyway.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It is not saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.\\\\\\\\\\\\

\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.\\\\\\\\\\\\

\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.\\\\\\\\
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' it is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' it is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

e: christ that\\\'s an ugly post. Is there a bug or did i fuck up formatting somehow?

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

e: christ that\\\'s an ugly post. Is there a bug or did i fuck up formatting somehow?

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying Victoria is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' it is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it is saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' it is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' it is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.


\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.


Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' it is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis. \\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' it is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' it is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.\\\\\\\\
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' it is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' it is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.\\\\\\\\
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\'\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' it is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.

\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.

\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.

Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon Turner Diaries\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' it is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The \\\"Paleocon Turner Diaries\\\" description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying Victoria is to Paleocons what Turner Diaries is to Nazis.
Turner Diaries is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
Victoria mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in Turner is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas Turner focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, Victoria goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the Turner model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.

The Paleocon \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' description is basically accurate. It isn\\\'t saying the work is pro-Nazi, it\\\'s saying \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' it is to Paleocons what \\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is to Nazis.
\\\'\\\'Turner Diaries\\\'\\\' is a fictional first-person memoir of a guerrilla campaign against the Federal Government. It is a didactic work, primarily ideological, but also trying to convey practical lessons about how to fight such a war. For example, the book goes into detail about the procurement and use of a mortar, and about the construction and use of Improvised Explosive Devices (the latter example infamously directly inspired the Oklahoma City Bombing). The protagonists\\\' enemies are powerful, but are destroyed in large part by what the author considers to be their internal contradictions: the politically correct security services and military have riddled themselves with minorities, who in this universe are shiftless and incompetent, crippling their own ability to hunt down the protagonists.
\\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' mirrors this in many aspects. It is also a first-person memoir of a guerrilla war against the Federal Government and friends. It is primarily an ideological tract, going on at great length about things Lind doesn\\\'t like, but it also tries to convey what Lind considers to be authentic military lessons for the conduct of Fourth Generation Warfare (the Order\\\'s campaign described in \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' is also archetypal 4GW, so there is a lot of overlap in these lessons). The enemy, in each case, are undone by their internal contradictions as much as by any action of the protagonists - SecDef Mowunuu sabotages the Loyalist campaign, the Azanian Air Force can\\\'t dogfight because they\\\'re girls, the Nazis are incinerated in their own ovens, the New South devours itself, et cetera.
The biggest difference here is that whereas \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' focuses on the fight against the American state and only briefly describes the subsequent destruction of other ideological enemies (the mass murder of the Chinese and Africans) in the epilogue, \\\'\\\'Victoria\\\'\\\' goes on to describe wars against other powers after the Federal Government is destroyed. This is only a change of target, and the story continues to match the \\\'\\\'Turner\\\'\\\' model throughout - it\\\'s just a series of campaigns to build the ideal state, instead of a single campaign.
Both stories end with the creation of the author\\\'s ideal state, after their ideology (Nazism or Retroculture) has been proven categorically superior in all respects to the degenerate globalist System which fought in vain against it.