Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Both tropes are for Villains (he's not) or Anti-heroes (he's not that, either.) From MoralityPet:
to:
Both tropes are for Villains (he\'s not) or Anti-heroes (he\'s not that, either: \"a protagonist who has the opposite of most of the traditional attributes of a hero. They may be bewildered, ineffectual, deluded, or merely apathetic. More often an antihero is just an amoral misfit.\").
From MoralityPet: \"A Morality Pet is \'\'a character who redeems a villain. The villain\'s affection for the pet starts them down the path of good\'\', and even should the pet get hurt the villain will most likely behave as a hero (or anti-hero) in seeking their revenge or protecting the pet.\" Archie does not redeem Wolfe; Wolfe needs no redemption.
He\'s a crank and at a few times approaches {{Jerkass}} (\"A Jerkass is a character who is so completely obnoxious that it is unbelievable anyone would willingly interact with them.\") when dealing with suspects or obstreperous clients, but he needs to be more clearly on the side of the devils rather than being abrasively on the side of the angels for either PetTheDog or MoralityPet to apply.
From MoralityPet: \"A Morality Pet is \'\'a character who redeems a villain. The villain\'s affection for the pet starts them down the path of good\'\', and even should the pet get hurt the villain will most likely behave as a hero (or anti-hero) in seeking their revenge or protecting the pet.\" Archie does not redeem Wolfe; Wolfe needs no redemption.
He\'s a crank and at a few times approaches {{Jerkass}} (\"A Jerkass is a character who is so completely obnoxious that it is unbelievable anyone would willingly interact with them.\") when dealing with suspects or obstreperous clients, but he needs to be more clearly on the side of the devils rather than being abrasively on the side of the angels for either PetTheDog or MoralityPet to apply.
