[002]
Troperr2016
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don’t think D.W from Arthur should be on the scrappy page cause I think the writers wanted the viewers to hate D.W as her role on the show seems to just be a huge pest towards Arthur. This show is impossible to add traditional loathsome villains for people to despise due to it being for young kids and is PBS educational so I think the writers wanted fans to hate someone who just bugs Arthur a lot. Plus D.W falls victim to some misfortunes on the show and the books.
to:
I don’t think D.W from Arthur should be on the scrappy page cause I think the writers wanted the viewers to hate D.W as her role on the show seems to just be a huge pest towards Arthur. I think she is actually a hate sink. This show is impossible to add traditional loathsome villains for people to despise due to it being for young kids and is PBS educational so I think the writers wanted fans to hate someone who just bugs Arthur a lot. Plus D.W falls victim to some misfortunes on the show and the books. The explanation of her on the scrappy page said that she clearly exists to torment Arthur and the word “clearly” is what I find wrong with this and why I think D.W should be taken off the scrappy page even though she’s hated but its done intentionally
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Which is more or less what I've said. After all, a lot of critics, both professionals and semi-professionals, run blogs nowdays. Just don't use RandomJoe1982 as the source.
to:
Which is more or less what I\'ve said. After all, a lot of critics, both professionals and semi-professionals, run blogs nowdays. Just don\'t use [=RandomJoe1982=] as the source.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But it doesn't move the issue any step forward. Does {{Anvilicious}} need to be intentional or can it be accidental? I mean it's hard to treat it
to:
But it doesn\'t move the issue any step forward. Does {{Anvilicious}} need to be intentional or can it be accidental? I mean it\'s hard to treat it \"accidental\" to explicity list who is funding who and write an AlternateHistory background notes and trivia for the game, but still. I seriously doubt that anyone ever from the dev team in any interview outright said \"yeah, we wanted to make the game extremely unsuble about religion existing only to manipulate people\", but it doesn\'t change the fact it come off as conveying such message.
