Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Literature / VictoriaANovelOf4thGenerationWar

Go To

[003] Wyldchyld Current Version
Changed line(s) 10 from:
to:

Brought here to resolve whether or not the trope applies to Neo.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
From a legalistic viewpoint, that's kind of an interesting question. Generally speaking, [=TVTropes=] policy [[Administrivia/PrescriptiveVsDescriptiveLanguage discourages]] bashing, even of widely disliked right-wing series like Terry Goodkind's fantasy stories or the guy who writes the ''Left Behind'' Christian novels. ''Victoria'' certainly isn't any worse than those. Glancing at the Turner page, on the other hand, that one is definitely bashing that book. Maybe people are just more upset when it's Nazis praising mass genocides than when it's all-American Christian fundamentalists who do it?
to:
From a legalistic viewpoint, that\'s kind of an interesting question. Generally speaking, [=TVTropes=] policy [[Administrivia/PrescriptiveVsDescriptiveLanguage discourages]] bashing, even of widely disliked right-wing series like Terry Goodkind\'s fantasy stories or the guy who writes the \'\'Left Behind\'\' Christian novels. \'\'Victoria\'\' certainly isn\'t any worse than those. Glancing at the Turner page, on the other hand, that one is definitely bashing that book. Maybe people are just more upset when it\'s Nazis praising mass genocides than when it\'s all-American Christian fundamentalists who do it?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
That's probably a topic for another discussion, though. Concerning this page, I'd say neutral and honest is really all we need. So I think it's actually pretty good the way it is now, with mostly relatively unbiased descriptions. ''Victoria'' speaks for itself. No one reading the intro and the first few examples, never mind the whole thing, can possibly miss that this is a surreal, wingnut book. And then everyone can judge for himself whether it's the SoBadItsGood or SoBadItsHorrible type of crazy.
to:
That\'s probably a topic for another discussion, though. Concerning this page, I\'d say neutral and honest is really all we need. So I think it\'s actually pretty good the way it is now, with mostly relatively unbiased descriptions. \'\'Victoria\'\' speaks for itself. No one reading the intro and the first few examples, never mind the whole thing, can possibly miss that this is a surreal, wingnut book. And then everyone can judge for himself whether it\'s the SoBadItsGood or DarthWiki/SoBadItsHorrible type of crazy.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
From a legalistic viewpoint, that's kind of an interesting question. Generally speaking, [=TVTropes=] policy [[Administratrivia/PrescriptiveVsDescriptiveLanguage discourages]] bashing, even of widely disliked right-wing series like Terry Goodkind's fantasy stories or the guy who writes the ''Left Behind'' Christian novels. ''Victoria'' certainly isn't any worse than those. Glancing at the Turner page, on the other hand, that one is definitely bashing that book. Maybe people are just more upset when it's Nazis praising mass genocides than when it's all-American Christian fundamentalists who do it?
to:
From a legalistic viewpoint, that\'s kind of an interesting question. Generally speaking, [=TVTropes=] policy [[Administrivia/PrescriptiveVsDescriptiveLanguage discourages]] bashing, even of widely disliked right-wing series like Terry Goodkind\'s fantasy stories or the guy who writes the \'\'Left Behind\'\' Christian novels. \'\'Victoria\'\' certainly isn\'t any worse than those. Glancing at the Turner page, on the other hand, that one is definitely bashing that book. Maybe people are just more upset when it\'s Nazis praising mass genocides than when it\'s all-American Christian fundamentalists who do it?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
That's probably a topic for another discussion, though. Concerning this page, I'd say neutral and honest is really all we need. So I think it's actually pretty good the way it is now, with mostly relatively unbiased descriptions. ''Victoria'' speaks for itself. No one reading the intro and the first few examples, never mind the whole thing, can possibly miss that this is a surreal, wingnut book. And then everyone can judge for himself whether it's the SoBadItsGood or SoBadItsHorrible type of crazy.
to:
That\'s probably a topic for another discussion, though. Concerning this page, I\'d say neutral and honest is really all we need. So I think it\'s actually pretty good the way it is now, with mostly relatively unbiased descriptions. \'\'Victoria\'\' speaks for itself. No one reading the intro and the first few examples, never mind the whole thing, can possibly miss that this is a surreal, wingnut book. And then everyone can judge for himself whether it\'s the SoBadItsGood or SoBadItsHorrible type of crazy.
Top