[004]
BURGINABC
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I think it's less a zig-zag and more of a semantic issue, where whether it's even applicable at all depends on how you define
to:
I think it\'s less a zig-zag and more of a semantic issue, where whether it\'s even applicable at all depends on how you define \"just because he\'s a fox\".
If that is taken to imply \"because foxes are just inherently untrustworthy\", then this is a simple, straightforward example of RightForTheWrongReasons.
If, however, you define \"just because he\'s a fox\" more broadly to simply mean \"because foxes are known to behave that way\" (regardless of the actual reason that they do so), then it\'s not an example at all.
If that is taken to imply \"because foxes are just inherently untrustworthy\", then this is a simple, straightforward example of RightForTheWrongReasons.
If, however, you define \"just because he\'s a fox\" more broadly to simply mean \"because foxes are known to behave that way\" (regardless of the actual reason that they do so), then it\'s not an example at all.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I think it's less a zig-zag and more of a semantic issue, where whether it's even applicable at all depends on how you define
to:
I think it\'s less a zig-zag and more of a semantic issue, where whether it\'s even applicable at all depends on how you define \"just because he\'s a fox\".
If that is taken to imply \"because foxes are just inherently untrustworthy\", then this is a simple, straightforward example of RightForTheWrongReasons.
If, however, you define \"just because he\'s a fox\" more broadly to also include \"because foxes are known to behave that way\" (regardless of the actual reason that they do so), then it\'s not an example at all.
If that is taken to imply \"because foxes are just inherently untrustworthy\", then this is a simple, straightforward example of RightForTheWrongReasons.
If, however, you define \"just because he\'s a fox\" more broadly to also include \"because foxes are known to behave that way\" (regardless of the actual reason that they do so), then it\'s not an example at all.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I think it's less a zig-zag and more of a semantic issue, where whether it's even applicable at all depends on how you define
to:
I think it\'s less a zig-zag and more of a semantic issue, where whether it\'s even applicable at all depends on how you define \"just because he\'s a fox\".
If that is taken to imply \"because foxes are just inherently untrustworthy\", then this is a simple, straightforward example of RightForTheWrongReasons.
If, however, you define \"just because he\'s a fox\" more broadly to also include \"because foxes are known to behave that way\" (regardless of the actual reason), then it\'s not an example at all.
If that is taken to imply \"because foxes are just inherently untrustworthy\", then this is a simple, straightforward example of RightForTheWrongReasons.
If, however, you define \"just because he\'s a fox\" more broadly to also include \"because foxes are known to behave that way\" (regardless of the actual reason), then it\'s not an example at all.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I think it's less a zig-zag and more of a semantic issue, where whether it's even applicable at all depends on how you define
to:
I think it\'s less a zig-zag and more of a semantic issue, where whether it\'s even applicable at all depends on how you define \"just because he\'s a fox\".
If that is taken to imply \"because foxes are just inherently untrustworthy\", then this is a simple, straightforward example of RightForTheWrongReasons.
If, however, you define \"just because he\'s a fox\" more broadly to also include \"because foxes are known to act that way\" (regardless of the actual reason), then it\'s not an example at all.
If that is taken to imply \"because foxes are just inherently untrustworthy\", then this is a simple, straightforward example of RightForTheWrongReasons.
If, however, you define \"just because he\'s a fox\" more broadly to also include \"because foxes are known to act that way\" (regardless of the actual reason), then it\'s not an example at all.
