[002]
Larkmarn
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don't think you read my issues with the DiscussedTrope thing. That entry, for example, if it is valid (and I still don't believe it would be, but I'll leave that up to other tropers to break our tie) wouldn't be RealLife, but would be Website.
to:
I don\'t think you read my issues with the DiscussedTrope thing. That entry, for example, if it is valid (and I still don\'t believe it would be, but I\'ll leave that up to other tropers to break our tie) wouldn\'t be RealLife, but would be Website.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
And the other issue with the wind thing... charitably, if we want to consider it relevant to the page at hand it's clearly natter as it's discussion in the main page. You're seeking to
to:
And the other issue with the wind thing... charitably, if we want to consider it relevant to the page at hand it\'s clearly natter as it\'s discussion in the main page. You\'re seeking to \"correct\" the above example which is never allowed.
I appreciate that you want a quick resolution to this, so do I. But until we see eye-to-eye you\'re not supposed to readd contested content. Even if you \'\'think\'\' you\'re addressing someone\'s problem, you might not be and it comes across as being in bad faith.
I do hope I don\'t come across as being too harsh. Let me know if there\'s anything else that needs clarification.
I appreciate that you want a quick resolution to this, so do I. But until we see eye-to-eye you\'re not supposed to readd contested content. Even if you \'\'think\'\' you\'re addressing someone\'s problem, you might not be and it comes across as being in bad faith.
I do hope I don\'t come across as being too harsh. Let me know if there\'s anything else that needs clarification.
