[008]
capthanos
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Some of these issues have to do with the two BrokenBase entries underneath the
to:
Some of these issues have to do with the two BrokenBase entries underneath the \"Franchise as a Whole\" folder:
1. For one thing, the first entry under BrokenBase (about Bryke) is very one-sided. It is so one-sided that it only looks like the complaints of one side of the fanbase, when it should really have more focus on both parts of the fanbase; in this case, it should be looking at how each side of the fanbase views Bryke.
2. Another issue in the first entry has to do with a specific inaccuracy: \"their refusal to listen to criticism.\" This is written in response to their work on \'\'The Legend Of Korra.\'\' However, it is very clear with the subsequent books of \'\'Korra\'\' that Bryke \'\'did\'\' listen to criticism, regardless of whether or not someone likes the ways that they have tried to WinBackTheCrowd.
3. For the second BrokenBase entry (the one about relationships and romance) under the \"Franchise as a Whole,\" there is the same issue as issue number 1. It does not read like a BrokenBase entry.
4. Again, in regards to the second entry, there are some relationships that really \'\'do\'\' deserve a BrokenBase entry (like Katara/Aang, Varrick/Zhu Li, Mako/Korra, Korra/Asami), but one that deals with the feud between each side of the fanbase in regard to each relationship. They don\'t all need a separate entry, but there should be more than the one-sided argument made.
Edit: I have made some corrections to my post to clarify what I am trying to say.
1. For one thing, the first entry under BrokenBase (about Bryke) is very one-sided. It is so one-sided that it only looks like the complaints of one side of the fanbase, when it should really have more focus on both parts of the fanbase; in this case, it should be looking at how each side of the fanbase views Bryke.
2. Another issue in the first entry has to do with a specific inaccuracy: \"their refusal to listen to criticism.\" This is written in response to their work on \'\'The Legend Of Korra.\'\' However, it is very clear with the subsequent books of \'\'Korra\'\' that Bryke \'\'did\'\' listen to criticism, regardless of whether or not someone likes the ways that they have tried to WinBackTheCrowd.
3. For the second BrokenBase entry (the one about relationships and romance) under the \"Franchise as a Whole,\" there is the same issue as issue number 1. It does not read like a BrokenBase entry.
4. Again, in regards to the second entry, there are some relationships that really \'\'do\'\' deserve a BrokenBase entry (like Katara/Aang, Varrick/Zhu Li, Mako/Korra, Korra/Asami), but one that deals with the feud between each side of the fanbase in regard to each relationship. They don\'t all need a separate entry, but there should be more than the one-sided argument made.
Edit: I have made some corrections to my post to clarify what I am trying to say.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Some of these issues have to do with the two BrokenBase entries underneath the
to:
Some of these issues have to do with the two BrokenBase entries underneath the \"Franchise as a Whole\" folder:
1. For one thing, the first entry under BrokenBase (about Bryke) is very one-sided. It is so one-sided that it only looks like the complaints of one side of the fanbase, when it should really have more focus on both parts of the fanbase; in this case, it should be looking at how each side of the fanbase views Bryke.
2. Another issue in the first entry has to do with a specific inaccuracy: \"their refusal to listen to criticism.\" This is written in response to their work on \'\'The Legend Of Korra.\'\' However, I think this phrase needs to be deleted because it is very clear with the subsequent books of \'\'Korra\'\' that Bryke \'\'did\'\' listen to criticism, regardless of whether or not someone likes the ways that they have tried to WinBackTheCrowd.
3. For the second BrokenBase entry (the one about relationships and romance) under the \"Franchise as a Whole,\" there is the same issue as issue number 1. It does not read like a BrokenBase entry.
4. Again, in regards to the second entry, there are some relationships that really \'\'do\'\' deserve a BrokenBase entry (like Katara/Aang, Varrick/Zhu Li, Mako/Korra, Korra/Asami), but one that deals with the feud between each side of the fanbase in regard to each relationship. They don\'t all need a separate entry, but there should be more than the one-sided argument made.
Edit: I have made some corrections to my post to clarify what I am trying to say.
1. For one thing, the first entry under BrokenBase (about Bryke) is very one-sided. It is so one-sided that it only looks like the complaints of one side of the fanbase, when it should really have more focus on both parts of the fanbase; in this case, it should be looking at how each side of the fanbase views Bryke.
2. Another issue in the first entry has to do with a specific inaccuracy: \"their refusal to listen to criticism.\" This is written in response to their work on \'\'The Legend Of Korra.\'\' However, I think this phrase needs to be deleted because it is very clear with the subsequent books of \'\'Korra\'\' that Bryke \'\'did\'\' listen to criticism, regardless of whether or not someone likes the ways that they have tried to WinBackTheCrowd.
3. For the second BrokenBase entry (the one about relationships and romance) under the \"Franchise as a Whole,\" there is the same issue as issue number 1. It does not read like a BrokenBase entry.
4. Again, in regards to the second entry, there are some relationships that really \'\'do\'\' deserve a BrokenBase entry (like Katara/Aang, Varrick/Zhu Li, Mako/Korra, Korra/Asami), but one that deals with the feud between each side of the fanbase in regard to each relationship. They don\'t all need a separate entry, but there should be more than the one-sided argument made.
Edit: I have made some corrections to my post to clarify what I am trying to say.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Some of these issues have to do with the two BrokenBase entries underneath the
to:
Some of these issues have to do with the two BrokenBase entries underneath the \"Franchise as a Whole\" folder:
1. For one thing, the first entry under BrokenBase (about Bryke) is very one-sided. It is so one-sided that it only looks like the complaints of one side of the fanbase, when it should really have more focus on both parts of the fanbase; in this case, it should be looking at how each side of the fanbase views Bryke.
2. Another issue in the first entry has to do with a specific inaccuracy: \"their refusal to listen to criticism.\" This is written in response to their work on \'\'The Legend Of Korra.\'\' However, it is very clear with the subsequent books of \'\'Korra\'\' that Bryke \'\'did\'\' listen to criticism, regardless of whether or not someone likes the ways that they have tried to WinBackTheCrowd.
3. For the second BrokenBase entry (the one about relationships and romance) under the \"Franchise as a Whole,\" there is the same issue as issue number 1. It does not read like a BrokenBase entry.
4. Again, in regards to the second entry, there are some relationships that really \'\'do\'\' deserve a BrokenBase entry (like Katara/Aang, Varrick/Zhu Li, Mako/Korra, Korra/Asami), but one that deals with the feud between each side of the fanbase in regard to each relationship. They don\'t all need a separate entry, but there should be more than the one-sided argument made.
Edit: I have made some corrections to my post to clarify what I am trying to say.
1. For one thing, the first entry under BrokenBase (about Bryke) is very one-sided. It is so one-sided that it only looks like the complaints of one side of the fanbase, when it should really have more focus on both parts of the fanbase; in this case, it should be looking at how each side of the fanbase views Bryke.
2. Another issue in the first entry has to do with a specific inaccuracy: \"their refusal to listen to criticism.\" This is written in response to their work on \'\'The Legend Of Korra.\'\' However, it is very clear with the subsequent books of \'\'Korra\'\' that Bryke \'\'did\'\' listen to criticism, regardless of whether or not someone likes the ways that they have tried to WinBackTheCrowd.
3. For the second BrokenBase entry (the one about relationships and romance) under the \"Franchise as a Whole,\" there is the same issue as issue number 1. It does not read like a BrokenBase entry.
4. Again, in regards to the second entry, there are some relationships that really \'\'do\'\' deserve a BrokenBase entry (like Katara/Aang, Varrick/Zhu Li, Mako/Korra, Korra/Asami), but one that deals with the feud between each side of the fanbase in regard to each relationship. They don\'t all need a separate entry, but there should be more than the one-sided argument made.
Edit: I have made some corrections to my post to clarify what I am trying to say.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Due to a previous occurrence when I was less experienced, I have decided not to edit specific entries on this page (that I had previously edited several months ago which almost got me in trouble (though I had not known what edit warring was at the time)) because of the possibility that I might be accused of edit warring. However, I do find several issues with some things on this page that I think really need to be fixed.
to:
Due to a previous occurrence when I was less experienced, I have decided not to edit specific entries on this page (that I had previously edited several months ago which almost got me in trouble (because unfortunately, I had not known what edit warring was at the time)) because of the possibility that I might be accused of edit warring. However, I do find several issues with some things on this page that I think really need to be fixed.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Some of these issues have to do with the two BrokenBase entries underneath the
to:
Some of these issues have to do with the two BrokenBase entries underneath the \"Franchise as a Whole\" folder:
1. For one thing, the first entry under BrokenBase (about Bryke) is very one-sided. It is so one-sided that it only looks like the complaints of one side of the fanbase, when it should really have more focus on both parts of the fanbase; in this case, it should be looking at how each side of the fanbase views Bryke.
2. Another issue in the first entry has to do with a specific inaccuracy: \"their refusal to listen to criticism.\" This is written in response to their work on \'\'The Legend Of Korra.\'\' However, it is very clear with the subsequent books of \'\'Korra\'\' that Bryke \'\'did\'\' listen to criticism, regardless of whether or not someone likes the ways that they have tried to WinBackTheCrowd.
3. For the second BrokenBase entry (the one about relationships and romance) under the \"Franchise as a Whole,\" there is the same issue as issue number 1. It does not read like a BrokenBase entry.
4. In regards to the second entry, there are some relationships that really \'\'do\'\' deserve a BrokenBase entry (like Katara/Aang, Varrick/Zhu Li, Mako/Korra, Korra/Asami), but one that deals with the feud between each side of the fanbase in regard to each relationship. They don\'t all need a separate entry, but there should be more than the one-sided argument made.
1. For one thing, the first entry under BrokenBase (about Bryke) is very one-sided. It is so one-sided that it only looks like the complaints of one side of the fanbase, when it should really have more focus on both parts of the fanbase; in this case, it should be looking at how each side of the fanbase views Bryke.
2. Another issue in the first entry has to do with a specific inaccuracy: \"their refusal to listen to criticism.\" This is written in response to their work on \'\'The Legend Of Korra.\'\' However, it is very clear with the subsequent books of \'\'Korra\'\' that Bryke \'\'did\'\' listen to criticism, regardless of whether or not someone likes the ways that they have tried to WinBackTheCrowd.
3. For the second BrokenBase entry (the one about relationships and romance) under the \"Franchise as a Whole,\" there is the same issue as issue number 1. It does not read like a BrokenBase entry.
4. In regards to the second entry, there are some relationships that really \'\'do\'\' deserve a BrokenBase entry (like Katara/Aang, Varrick/Zhu Li, Mako/Korra, Korra/Asami), but one that deals with the feud between each side of the fanbase in regard to each relationship. They don\'t all need a separate entry, but there should be more than the one-sided argument made.
