Discussion History UsefulNotes / JosefStalin

That does not sound like a valid reason. The page for Adolf Hitler is much longer, and he is even described using the term \"genocidal fuckhead\" on that page; Stalin\'s had similar plans for the Jews as well among other atrocities. Stalin was also a dictator who was efficient in carrying out his evil will, had the blood of millions on his hands and was self-absorbed in his vision. Hitler and Stalin at one point even had a peace treaty. Why refrain from a long commentary on Stalin but go to town on Hitler? Both Stalin and Hitler were mass-murdering tyrants

That does not sound like a valid reason. The page for Adolf Hitler is much longer, and he is even described using the term \"genocidal fuckhead\" on that page; Stalin\'s had similar plans for the Jews as well among other atrocities. Stalin was also a dictator who was efficient in carrying out his evil will, had the blood of millions on his hands and was self-absorbed in his vision. Hitler and Stalin at one point even had a peace treaty. Why refrain from a long commentary on Stalin but go to town on Hitler? Both Stalin and Hitler were tyrannical monsters.

That does not sound like a valid reason. The page for Adolf Hitler is much longer, and he is even described using the term \"genocidial fuckhead\" on that page; Stalin\'s had similar plans for the Jews as well among other atroticies. Stalin was also a dictator who was efficient in carrying out his evil will, had the blood of millions on his hands and was self-absorbed in his vision. Why refrain from a long commentary on Stalin but go to town on Hitler? Both Stalin and Hitler were monsters.