Discussion History Literature / WarriorCats

A lot of these pages are beginning to look like \"Swiss Cheese entries\", with frequent \"holes\" where spoilers are hidden in tags. Due to the fact that this makes the page very difficult to read and edit (especially when adhering to the policy of not hiding the trope name or full example in a spoiler tag), that the Administrivia/HandlingSpoilers page recommends erring on the side of \'\'less\'\' spoiler tags, that some of the things hidden in spoiler tags are more than a decade old, and the very spoiler-y nature of the series in general (what with all the {{Spoiler Title}}s and even \'\'character names\'\' being spoilers), I propose the following: That, like many other pages on TV Tropes, only the spoilers from the most recent book (or most recent main-series book & most recent side book) are hidden, and we put a \"beware unmarked spoilers\" tag toward the top. Does anyone oppose this? Figured I\'d put the idea out there before making such a major change.

EDIT: Looks like there\'s an older discussion about spoilers as well, didn\'t see that. So I\'m not the only one who thinks the pages need work as far as this goes.

EDIT2, 11/21/16: Since there\'s been no objections and I think it would really help the page, I\'ve started with it.

A lot of these pages are beginning to look like \"Swiss Cheese entries\", with frequent \"holes\" where spoilers are hidden in tags. Due to the fact that this makes the page very difficult to read and edit (especially when adhering to the policy of not hiding the trope name or full example in a spoiler tag), that the Administrivia/HandlingSpoilers page recommends erring on the side of \'\'less\'\' spoiler tags, that some of the things hidden in spoiler tags are more than a decade old, and the very spoiler-y nature of the series in general (what with all the {{Spoiler Title}}s and even \'\'character names\'\' being spoilers), I propose the following: That, like many other pages on TV Tropes, only the spoilers from the most recent book (or most recent main-series book & most recent side book) are hidden, and we put a \"beware unmarked spoilers\" tag toward the top. Does anyone oppose this? Figured I\'d put the idea out there before making such a major change.

EDIT: Looks like there\'s an older discussion about spoilers as well, didn\'t see that. So I\'m not the only one who thinks the pages need work as far as this goes.

A lot of these pages are beginning to look like \"Swiss Cheese entries\", with frequent \"holes\" where spoilers are hidden in tags. Due to the fact that this makes the page very difficult to read and edit (especially when adhering to the policy of not hiding the trope name or full example in a spoiler tag), that the Administrivia/HandlingSpoilers page recommends erring on the side of \'\'less\'\' spoiler tags, that some of the things hidden in spoiler tags are more than a decade old, and the very spoiler-y nature of the series in general (what with all the {{Spoiler Title}}s and even \'\'character names\'\' being spoilers), I propose the following: That, like many other pages on TV Tropes, only the spoilers from the most recent book are hidden, and we put a \"beware unmarked spoilers\" tag toward the top. Does anyone oppose this? Figured I\'d put the idea out there before making such a major change.

EDIT: Looks like there\'s an older discussion about spoilers as well, didn\'t see that. So I\'m not the only one who thinks the pages need work as far as this goes.

A lot of these pages are beginning to look like \"Swiss Cheese entries\", with frequent \"holes\" where spoilers are commented out. Due to the fact that this makes the page very difficult to read and edit (especially when adhering to the policy of not hiding the trope name or full example in a spoiler tag), that the Administrivia/HandlingSpoilers page recommends erring on the side of \'\'less\'\' spoiler tags, that some of the things hidden in spoiler tags are more than a decade old, and the very spoiler-y nature of the series in general (what with all the {{Spoiler Title}}s and even \'\'character names\'\' being spoilers), I propose the following: That, like many other pages on TV Tropes, only the spoilers from the most recent book are hidden, and we put a \"beware unmarked spoilers\" tag toward the top. Does anyone oppose this? Figured I\'d put the idea out there before making such a major change.

EDIT: Looks like there\'s an older discussion about spoilers as well, didn\'t see that. So I\'m not the only one who thinks the pages need work as far as this goes.

A lot of these pages are beginning to look like \"Swiss Cheese entries\", with frequent \"holes\" where spoilers are commented out. Due to the fact that this makes the page very difficult to read and edit (especially when adhering to the policy of not hiding the trope name or full example in a spoiler tag), that the Administrivia/HandlingSpoilers page recommends erring on the side of \'\'less\'\' spoiler tags, that some of the things hidden in spoiler tags are more than a decade old, and the very spoiler-y nature of the series in general (what with all the {{Spoiler Title}}s and even \'\'character names\'\' being spoilers), I propose the following: That, like many other pages on TV Tropes, only the spoilers from the most recent book are hidden, and we put a \"beware unmarked spoilers\" tag toward the top. Does anyone oppose this? Figured I\'d put the idea out there before making such a major change.

A lot of these pages are beginning to look like \"Swiss Cheese entries\", with frequent \"holes\" where spoilers are commented out. Due to the fact that this makes the page very difficult to read and edit (especially when adhering to the policy of not hiding the trope name or full example in a spoiler tag), that the Administrivia/HandlingSpoilers page recommends erring on the side of \'\'less\'\' spoiler tags, that some of the things hidden in spoiler tags are more than a decade old, and the very spoiler-y nature of the series in general (what with all the {{Spoiler Title}}s and even \'\'character names\'\' being spoilers), I propose the following: That, like many other pages on TV Tropes, only the spoilers from the most recent book are hidden, and we put a \"beware unmarked spoilers\" tag toward the top. Does anyone else agree? Figured I\'d put the idea out there before making such a major change.