[005]
quirkygenius
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
to:
You are wrong, this page is the perfect place for my posts. This the purpose is the YMMV page; the Your Mileage May Vary page. To quote from the YMMV home page describing the purpose; \"The article might call for a value judgment and your judgment call could be different from another troper\'s\". Just because you (and perhaps others) don\'t like my points or disagree with them does not justify removing them because, as mentioned before, listing and explaining subjective tropes is the entire purpose of this page. Even if other people agree with you that won\'t justify removing my posts here. I am repeating myself [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped to drive the point home]].
It is obvious that my reasons will not be good enough for you because you appear to be using just feelings now, not reason; you said you hate my posts and \"feel\" that they have no place here. In this case, no reason would be good enough no matter how valid. Even if I wrote a thesis or published a book on the subject it still wouldn\'t resonate with you if you don\'t use reason over feeling. You also missed the point that not everything I typed was my view. I do not consider the movie misandrist. I was pointing out these alternate views that exist as well as posting other views of my own (such as how [[MoralMyopia the Vuvalini\'s misandry gets a pass compared to the villains misogyny]]). I also have no problem with you disagreeing with me. I do have a problem with having my views, OR facts that I present, be slandered.
You said it was bad form to wipe my posts based solely on your opinion. That sounds like if even one other agreed with you, you would take up arms against my posts again. On that note, I forgot to mention that your attempt to rally people against me is a form of cyberbullying. As stated before, I have as much right to my posts as you do yours, whether you like it or not. So even if someone else agrees with you, accept their agreement but let the matter between us rest and make no further attack on these posts of mine.
Let this be the end of the matter.
It is obvious that my reasons will not be good enough for you because you appear to be using just feelings now, not reason; you said you hate my posts and \"feel\" that they have no place here. In this case, no reason would be good enough no matter how valid. Even if I wrote a thesis or published a book on the subject it still wouldn\'t resonate with you if you don\'t use reason over feeling. You also missed the point that not everything I typed was my view. I do not consider the movie misandrist. I was pointing out these alternate views that exist as well as posting other views of my own (such as how [[MoralMyopia the Vuvalini\'s misandry gets a pass compared to the villains misogyny]]). I also have no problem with you disagreeing with me. I do have a problem with having my views, OR facts that I present, be slandered.
You said it was bad form to wipe my posts based solely on your opinion. That sounds like if even one other agreed with you, you would take up arms against my posts again. On that note, I forgot to mention that your attempt to rally people against me is a form of cyberbullying. As stated before, I have as much right to my posts as you do yours, whether you like it or not. So even if someone else agrees with you, accept their agreement but let the matter between us rest and make no further attack on these posts of mine.
Let this be the end of the matter.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
to:
You are wrong, this page is the perfect place for my posts. This the purpose is the YMMV page; the Your Mileage May Vary page. To quote from the YMMV home page describing the purpose; \"The article might call for a value judgment and your judgment call could be different from another troper\'s\". Just because you (and perhaps others) don\'t like my points or disagree with them does not justify removing them because, as mentioned before, listing and explaining subjective tropes is the entire purpose of this page. Even if other people agree with you that won\'t justify removing my posts here. I am repeating myself [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped to drive the point home]].
It is obvious that my reasons will not be good enough for you because you appear to be using just feelings now, not reason; you said you hate my posts and \"feel\" that they have no place here. In this case, no reason would be good enough no matter how valid. Even if I wrote a thesis or published a book on the subject it still wouldn\'t resonate with you if you don\'t use reason over feeling. You also missed the point that not everything I typed was my view. I do not consider the movie misandrist. I was pointing out these alternate views that exist as well as posting other views of my own (such as how [[MoralMyopia the Vuvalini\'s misandry gets a pass compared to the villains misogyny]]). I also have no problem with you disagreeing with me, I do have a problem with having my views, OR facts I present, be slandered.
You said it was bad form to wipe my posts based solely on your opinion. That sounds like if even one other agreed with you, you would take up arms against my posts again. On that note, I forgot to mention that your attempt to rally people against me is a form of cyberbullying. As stated before, I have as much right to my posts as you do yours, whether you like it or not. So even if someone else agrees with you, accept their agreement but let the matter between us rest and make no further attack on these posts of mine.
Let this be the end of the matter.
It is obvious that my reasons will not be good enough for you because you appear to be using just feelings now, not reason; you said you hate my posts and \"feel\" that they have no place here. In this case, no reason would be good enough no matter how valid. Even if I wrote a thesis or published a book on the subject it still wouldn\'t resonate with you if you don\'t use reason over feeling. You also missed the point that not everything I typed was my view. I do not consider the movie misandrist. I was pointing out these alternate views that exist as well as posting other views of my own (such as how [[MoralMyopia the Vuvalini\'s misandry gets a pass compared to the villains misogyny]]). I also have no problem with you disagreeing with me, I do have a problem with having my views, OR facts I present, be slandered.
You said it was bad form to wipe my posts based solely on your opinion. That sounds like if even one other agreed with you, you would take up arms against my posts again. On that note, I forgot to mention that your attempt to rally people against me is a form of cyberbullying. As stated before, I have as much right to my posts as you do yours, whether you like it or not. So even if someone else agrees with you, accept their agreement but let the matter between us rest and make no further attack on these posts of mine.
Let this be the end of the matter.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
to:
You are wrong, this page is the perfect place for my posts. This the purpose is the YMMV page; the Your Mileage May Vary page. To quote from the YMMV home page describing the purpose; \"The article might call for a value judgment and your judgment call could be different from another troper\'s\". Just because you (and perhaps others) don\'t like my points or disagree with them does not justify removing them because, as mentioned before, listing and explaining subjective tropes is the entire purpose of this page. On that note, even if other people agree with you that won\'t justify removing my posts here. I am repeating myself [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped to drive the point home]].
It is obvious that my reasons will not be good enough for you because you appear to be using just feelings now, not reason; you said you hate my posts and \"feel\" that they have no place here. In this case, no reason would be good enough no matter how valid. Even if I wrote a thesis or published a book on the subject it still wouldn\'t resonate with you if you don\'t use reason over feeling. You also missed the point that not everything I typed was my view. I do not consider the movie misandrist. I was pointing out these alternate views that exist as well as posting other views of my own (such as how [[MoralMyopia the Vuvalini\'s misandry gets a pass compared to the villains misogyny]]). I also have no problem with you disagreeing with me, I do have a problem with having my views, OR facts I present, be slandered.
You said it was bad form to wipe my posts based solely on your opinion. That sounds like if even one other agreed with you, you would take up arms against my posts again. On that note, I forgot to mention that your attempt to rally people against me is a form of cyberbullying. As stated before, I have as much right to my posts as you do yours, whether you like it or not. So even if someone else agrees with you, accept their agreement but let the matter between us rest and make no further attack on these posts of mine.
Let this be the end of the matter.
It is obvious that my reasons will not be good enough for you because you appear to be using just feelings now, not reason; you said you hate my posts and \"feel\" that they have no place here. In this case, no reason would be good enough no matter how valid. Even if I wrote a thesis or published a book on the subject it still wouldn\'t resonate with you if you don\'t use reason over feeling. You also missed the point that not everything I typed was my view. I do not consider the movie misandrist. I was pointing out these alternate views that exist as well as posting other views of my own (such as how [[MoralMyopia the Vuvalini\'s misandry gets a pass compared to the villains misogyny]]). I also have no problem with you disagreeing with me, I do have a problem with having my views, OR facts I present, be slandered.
You said it was bad form to wipe my posts based solely on your opinion. That sounds like if even one other agreed with you, you would take up arms against my posts again. On that note, I forgot to mention that your attempt to rally people against me is a form of cyberbullying. As stated before, I have as much right to my posts as you do yours, whether you like it or not. So even if someone else agrees with you, accept their agreement but let the matter between us rest and make no further attack on these posts of mine.
Let this be the end of the matter.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
to:
You are wrong, this page is the perfect place for my posts. This the purpose is the YMMV page; the Your Mileage May Vary page. To quote from the YMMV home page describing the purpose; \"The article might call for a value judgment and your judgment call could be different from another troper\'s\". Just because you (and perhaps others) don\'t like my points or disagree with them does not justify removing them because, as mentioned before, listing and explaining subjective tropes is the entire purpose of this page. On that note, even if other people agree with you that won\'t justify removing my posts here. I am repeating myself [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped to drive the point home]].
It is obvious that my reasons will not be good enough for you because you appear to be using just feelings now, not reason; you said you hate my posts and \"feel\" that they have no place here. In this case, no reason would be good enough no matter how valid. Even if I wrote a thesis or published a book on the subject it still wouldn\'t resonate with you if you don\'t use reason over feeling. You also missed the point that not everything I typed was my view. I do not consider the movie misandrist. I was pointing out these alternate views that exist as well as posting other views of my own (such as how [[TheUnfairSex the Vuvalini\'s misandry gets a pass compared to the villains misogyny]]). I also have no problem with you disagreeing with me, I do have a problem with having my views, OR facts I present, be slandered.
You said it was bad form to wipe my posts based solely on your opinion. That sounds like if even one other agreed with you, you would take up arms against my posts again. On that note, I forgot to mention that your attempt to rally people against me is a form of cyberbullying. As stated before, I have as much right to my posts as you do yours, whether you like it or not. So even if someone else agrees with you, accept their agreement but let the matter between us rest and make no further attack on these posts of mine.
Let this be the end of the matter.
It is obvious that my reasons will not be good enough for you because you appear to be using just feelings now, not reason; you said you hate my posts and \"feel\" that they have no place here. In this case, no reason would be good enough no matter how valid. Even if I wrote a thesis or published a book on the subject it still wouldn\'t resonate with you if you don\'t use reason over feeling. You also missed the point that not everything I typed was my view. I do not consider the movie misandrist. I was pointing out these alternate views that exist as well as posting other views of my own (such as how [[TheUnfairSex the Vuvalini\'s misandry gets a pass compared to the villains misogyny]]). I also have no problem with you disagreeing with me, I do have a problem with having my views, OR facts I present, be slandered.
You said it was bad form to wipe my posts based solely on your opinion. That sounds like if even one other agreed with you, you would take up arms against my posts again. On that note, I forgot to mention that your attempt to rally people against me is a form of cyberbullying. As stated before, I have as much right to my posts as you do yours, whether you like it or not. So even if someone else agrees with you, accept their agreement but let the matter between us rest and make no further attack on these posts of mine.
Let this be the end of the matter.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
to:
You are wrong, this page is the perfect place for my posts. This the purpose is the YMMV page; the Your Mileage May Vary page. To quote from the YMMV home page describing the purpose; \"The article might call for a value judgment and your judgment call could be different from another troper\'s\". Just because you (and perhaps others) don\'t like my points or disagree with them does not justify removing them because, as mentioned before, listing and explaining subjective tropes is the entire purpose of this page. On that note, even if other people agree with you that won\'t justify removing my posts here. I am repeating myself [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped to drive the point home]].
It is obvious that my reasons will not be good enough for you because you appear to be using just feelings now, not reason; you said you hate my posts and \"feel\" that they have no place here. In this case, no reason would be good enough no matter how valid. Even if I wrote a thesis or published a book on the subject it still wouldn\'t resonate with you if you don\'t use reason over feeling. You also missed the point that not everything I typed was my view. I do not consider the movie misandrist. I was pointing out these alternate views that exist as well as posting other views of my own (such as how [[TheUnfairSex the Vuvalini\'s misandry gets a pass compared to the villain\'s misogyny]]). I also have no problem with you disagreeing with me, I do have a problem with having my views, OR facts I present, be slandered.
You said it was bad form to wipe my posts based solely on your opinion. That sounds like if even one other agreed with you, you would take up arms against my posts again. On that note, I forgot to mention that your attempt to rally people against me is a form of cyberbullying. As stated before, I have as much right to my posts as you do yours, whether you like it or not. So even if someone else agrees with you, accept their agreement but let the matter between us rest and make no further attack on these posts of mine.
Let this be the end of the matter.
It is obvious that my reasons will not be good enough for you because you appear to be using just feelings now, not reason; you said you hate my posts and \"feel\" that they have no place here. In this case, no reason would be good enough no matter how valid. Even if I wrote a thesis or published a book on the subject it still wouldn\'t resonate with you if you don\'t use reason over feeling. You also missed the point that not everything I typed was my view. I do not consider the movie misandrist. I was pointing out these alternate views that exist as well as posting other views of my own (such as how [[TheUnfairSex the Vuvalini\'s misandry gets a pass compared to the villain\'s misogyny]]). I also have no problem with you disagreeing with me, I do have a problem with having my views, OR facts I present, be slandered.
You said it was bad form to wipe my posts based solely on your opinion. That sounds like if even one other agreed with you, you would take up arms against my posts again. On that note, I forgot to mention that your attempt to rally people against me is a form of cyberbullying. As stated before, I have as much right to my posts as you do yours, whether you like it or not. So even if someone else agrees with you, accept their agreement but let the matter between us rest and make no further attack on these posts of mine.
Let this be the end of the matter.
