MarqFJA
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
from Deserts of the Middle East
(Before Recorded History)
Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
No longer a forum herald
#3: Sep 1st 2010 at 9:07:07 PM
As far as I can tell, using awesome in the name is the only qualifier, in the same vein as Doomy Dooms of Doom and Screw This Index, I Have Tropes. Whether or not these are desirable is another question altogether.
In this case, I say merge the two into Truly Awesome Tropes. I'm a bit surprised at the number of examples that show up on one but not the other.
Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)
MarqFJA
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
from Deserts of the Middle East
(Before Recorded History)
Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
FastEddie
Since: Apr, 2004
#5: Oct 3rd 2010 at 12:36:41 PM
Nothing, and they are both pointless. I'll cut them.
ETA: That's done. We can always just do a title search with 'awesome' if we need to see the lists again. Which we really don't.
edited 3rd Oct '10 12:39:03 PM by FastEddie
Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
MarqFJA
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
from Deserts of the Middle East
(Before Recorded History)
Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
Total posts: 6
Articles in question: Everythings Awesome With Awesome and Truly Awesome Tropes.
I have tried and failed to understand what differentiates these two indices from each other. In addition, only Everythings Awesome With Awesome has a YKTTW discussion
, which did not even go beyond five replies, three of which were merely thread bumps.
I suggest a merge and a more clear description of just what qualifies a trope to be listed, beyond the obvious "if it uses awesome in its title, it qualifies".
edited 31st Aug '10 8:03:40 AM by MarqFJA
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.