Follow TV Tropes

Following

Edit banned/Suspended - would like to edit again.

Go To

This is the thread we use to talk things over with people who have received a suspension notice. A lot of the time the notice goes out just so we can explain how seriously we take certain things, not because we want the person to feel bad and go away.

If you're suspended, give What to Do If You Are Suspended a read, then post here to begin your appeal. We try to respond to appeals in order via batch posts every few days. If a moderator has responded to your appeal, you will receive a notification in your private messages, even if you're suspended from PMs.

The Forum Rules apply here.

Don'ts

  • Don't be rude. Rule 1 applies here, too.
  • Don't try to negotiate your suspension outside of this thread, such as by sending Private Messages to moderators or posting elsewhere. Such activity may be thumped or otherwise removed, and may warrant an additional suspension block if it keeps happening. All communications have to take place within this thread.
  • Don't respond to other suspended users. This is a place for you to discuss your suspension, not others'.
  • Don't post multiple times about your appeal if it hasn't been a few days since your last reply from us, since it makes it more difficult to compose responses. If you've posted, we're likely looking at it, and kindly request you to be more patient.
  • Don't make another account to try and get around your suspension. This is called ban evasion and will get you bounced. (Again, read What to Do If You Are Suspended if you don't know what these words mean.)

Edited by Synchronicity on Jul 15th 2023 at 11:35:01 AM

FastEddie MOD Since: Apr, 2004
#26: Dec 24th 2011 at 12:49:54 PM

Re: Sligh. Complete mistake. Sorry for the confusion.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
portal2000 Since: Dec, 2011
#27: Dec 24th 2011 at 2:08:26 PM

Please let me edit. :-).I'd like to edit again

McJeff McJeff from probably sitting at a computer Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
#28: Dec 24th 2011 at 4:44:44 PM

OK, so, Camacan gave me "a few days off" because I lost my temper and insulted someone. His words.

I asked if I could be unbanned and promised to be super-ultra-civil especially in my edit summaries and always post to the talk page every time I remove something.

Camacan never came by to talk to me, and over a week later I'm still banned.

What gives?

Russell... likes to hurt people... for PEACE.
Heart Heart from Skagen Since: Jan, 2010 Relationship Status: The Skitty to my Wailord
Heart
#29: Dec 24th 2011 at 6:09:22 PM

I understand. I will be more careful using any third level bullets in the future.

Listen to your convictions, even if they seem absurd to your reason.
Camacan MOD from Australiatown Since: Jan, 2001
#30: Dec 24th 2011 at 6:35:09 PM

[up][up] Been busy dude, sorry. I should asked you to come around edit banned in a week. Lifted the temp ban. I won't go over the problems we had again, you know the score.

ErisOnline from U.S.A. Since: Jun, 2010
#31: Dec 25th 2011 at 8:21:26 AM

I'm pretty sure I didn't do anything to earn this ban, but then again, I'm happy to have it explained to me.

TRUCKASAURUS
fifimcfeef A friend of Padraic from California Since: Jul, 2011
A friend of Padraic
#32: Dec 27th 2011 at 11:07:12 AM

I was edit banned for insisting that Bret Michaels was the fifth Beatle. It should take me a while to prove that he was retconned out of the band's history.

Yeah, Jason Kreis ain't exactly a soccer star.
FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#33: Dec 27th 2011 at 11:38:27 AM

^We really, very sincerely do not care if he was or not.

edited 27th Dec '11 11:39:54 AM by FastEddie

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
Madrugada MOD Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#34: Dec 27th 2011 at 11:45:48 AM

You were banned for trolling, since insisting that Bret Michaels was in the Beatles is difficult to interpret as anything but an attempt to start fights, since he was born in 1963, and the Beatles were already performing in Liverpool in 1960. Once they hit the big time in late '63 and '64, there was no way on earth that a member could be retconned out, and they'd broken up by the time he was 7 years old.

Take your crackpot theory somewhere else to peddle it.

edited 27th Dec '11 9:44:38 PM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Xzenu Since: Apr, 2010
#35: Dec 27th 2011 at 3:40:01 PM

I had a short break at work today, edited a bit through my iPhone. Some guy had been editing around a bit with a page illustration for Dominatrix, flipping back and forth between different versions. I supported the version he had added, and corrected a pothole. I didn't see anyone else than him and me being involved, so I didn't take the time to analyze the situation very much. If there was some edit-war or moderator intervention that I missed, sorry for not seeing it.

I apologize for editing instead of going "nice picture, but you should go through Image Picking - technically this trope already have an illustration, although I agree with your argument that the image is just a joke unrelated to the trope". Either that, or simply wait till I got home and go through the whole thing again.

Also, if someone considered his image to be offensive or NSFW, I apologize for stepping on their toes. Also also, sorry for taking up your time - with the edit and with this post.

FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#36: Dec 27th 2011 at 7:14:40 PM

Suspension lifted.

Yeah, we didn't want another escalation sequence on that image, which is why the rather neutral image is there.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
Heart Heart from Skagen Since: Jan, 2010 Relationship Status: The Skitty to my Wailord
Heart
#37: Dec 28th 2011 at 1:14:15 AM

Why was I briefly able to edit again and then disabled again? I did not actually make any edits, and it's been four days, what's happening?

edited 28th Dec '11 1:14:32 AM by Heart

Listen to your convictions, even if they seem absurd to your reason.
Moleman9000 Moleman9000 from The Mole Hole Since: Oct, 2010
Moleman9000
#38: Dec 28th 2011 at 1:56:48 PM

May I please have editing privileges? I seriously promise, I'll do only good stuff!

SickBritKid Since: Jan, 2010
#39: Dec 28th 2011 at 2:43:32 PM

So, uh, it would seem that I got edit-banned again. But this time, I don't understand why this time.

The only thing I can think got me thumped again was my argument/debate/diatribe/whatever in the Last Airbender discussion forum with Mr. Death.

I wasn't obstructing the page proper, we kept the discussion exclusively to the discussion forum, where we were told to take said argument, and there was never any warnings about our argument getting out of hand...

I'd like to ask why, exactly, I've been thumped again...

edited 28th Dec '11 2:44:23 PM by SickBritKid

FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#40: Dec 28th 2011 at 3:09:24 PM

Ad hominem attacks. No fun to be around.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
SickBritKid Since: Jan, 2010
#41: Dec 28th 2011 at 3:14:11 PM

Oh. Was it when I snarked about Death being too thick to listen to my argument?

I'd make an argument that I was telling the truth, but you do have a point about it being unwarranted. I was just reaching a frustration point and the whole thing was irking me.

Of course, it was irking me because Death went and constructed a Strawman out of my arguments as opposed to address my points properly...

If you grant me my editing privileges back, I'll go back to that post and remove all arguments as well as formulate a more proper and civil argument for my post and keep it civil.

edited 28th Dec '11 3:17:38 PM by SickBritKid

FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#42: Dec 28th 2011 at 3:31:48 PM

I've already zapped that spat fight. You wee suspended, then let back in, and went right back to the same stuff. Try us again in a couple of weeks.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
SickBritKid Since: Jan, 2010
#43: Dec 28th 2011 at 3:34:42 PM

Well, thanks for the zapping, I guess, because I was fully prepared to take responsibility for my irresponsibility and correct my mistakes myself...

Heart Heart from Skagen Since: Jan, 2010 Relationship Status: The Skitty to my Wailord
Heart
#44: Dec 28th 2011 at 6:55:07 PM

I'm sorry I didn't realize what I wrote was considered "natter". I promise it will not be repeated. Please may I edit again, it's been over a week?

Listen to your convictions, even if they seem absurd to your reason.
FastEddie MOD Since: Apr, 2004
#46: Dec 29th 2011 at 2:27:39 PM

We just need better writing than you are doing. Perhaps if you can get someone to work with you one-on-one in advance to make sure your text is good enough to post, we could accommodate your desire to contribute.

As it is now, the wiki's text could be in a poor state while it waits for someone to come along and fix your edits. Sort of unfair to the readers, and to the editors who would rather be doing something else than fixing grammar.

It is not impossible that there is a troper who would work with you by looking at your posts before they are made. Let's see if anyone volunteers.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
Heart Heart from Skagen Since: Jan, 2010 Relationship Status: The Skitty to my Wailord
Heart
#47: Dec 30th 2011 at 3:59:16 AM

Please, why will nobody answer me? I'm extremely, extremely, extremely sorry for the thing on the Skyrim page. It was a genuine piece of game lore and I did not realize it was against the rules, I thought the other person was simply disagreeing with the connection I was attempting to make. I'll never try to place any more sub-bullet detail entries on that page ever, ever again. I'm very sorry.

Listen to your convictions, even if they seem absurd to your reason.
FastEddie MOD Since: Apr, 2004
#48: Dec 30th 2011 at 9:17:36 AM

Edit warring was the thing, Heart, not the style or content of the edit. I'll lift the suspension, but try, next time you and another troper are seeing something differently, to take it to the discussion page.

edited 30th Dec '11 9:17:45 AM by FastEddie

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
Moleman9000 Moleman9000 from The Mole Hole Since: Oct, 2010
Moleman9000
#49: Dec 30th 2011 at 9:19:50 PM

PLEASE ANSWER ME (again). You still haven't given me definite advice or lifted the ban and I'm waiting on you guys still.sad

Camacan MOD from Australiatown Since: Jan, 2001
#50: Dec 30th 2011 at 9:44:59 PM

Christmas / New Years. The mods handling your case weren't around.

I'll give you a third, and last, chance — but we need 100% good edits from this point on. To avoid a final ban I'd strongly suggest reading through Welcome To Tv Tropes, How To Create A Work Page, Example Indentation, How To Write An Example and particularly YMMV.

Suspension lifted.


Total posts: 33,128
Top