Follow TV Tropes

Following

Making sure animated movie entries go in film.

Go To

HiddenFacedMatt Avatars may be subject to change without notice. Since: Jul, 2011
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
#1: Aug 22nd 2012 at 7:48:42 AM

I just came across another entry (on this page) that's about an animated movie, but was placed in the western animation section instead of the film section where it belongs. I moved it, but I'm noticing more and more seems to be a common troper habit; how do we go about fixing it?

One idea that comes to mind is to PM users who add such things to tell them they're putting entries in the wrong sections. As more of them realize it's in the wrong section, fewer of them add the misuse and presumably some of them will help clean it up; I think this would also set up a feedback loop wherein the less misuse there is, the less often it gives new tropers the wrong impression about where such entires go. But first I want to discuss this to see if it's a good idea.

edited 22nd Aug '12 7:49:15 AM by HiddenFacedMatt

"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon Stewart
abk0100 Since: Aug, 2011
#2: Aug 22nd 2012 at 8:58:23 AM

you mean "Film —- Animated", not just "Film", right?

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#3: Aug 22nd 2012 at 6:07:54 PM

Depends on whether Film is separated in Animated and Live Action or not. If it's not, Film is the correct one for both, to my understanding.

Check out my fanfiction!
Telcontar In uffish thought from England Since: Feb, 2012
In uffish thought
#4: Aug 23rd 2012 at 12:14:32 AM

I would say that if there's only Film and Western Animation, animated films should go in the latter category to fit with namespacing rules. If there are a lot, the folder could be soft split.

That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.
Jhiday (Don’t ask)
#5: Aug 23rd 2012 at 1:58:09 AM

[up][up] That's just postponing the problem for later. Pages where the "Film - Animated" category is missing despite exemples fitting just mean that nobody has bothered creating the category there yet. If you're going to move exemples around anyway, you should create the "Film - Animated" category.

It's the "correct" one, created for one purpose only : end the "Film or Western Animation" debate once and for all.

Nocturna Since: May, 2011
#6: Aug 23rd 2012 at 10:20:13 AM

[up][up] That's actually against the official categorization rules. Western animated films go in Film—Animated. I'm actually not sure whether that covers Japanese films and the like, though.

HiddenFacedMatt Avatars may be subject to change without notice. Since: Jul, 2011
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
#7: Aug 23rd 2012 at 11:19:57 AM

If you're going to move exemples around anyway, you should create the "Film - Animated" category.
Actually, I don't think we should. Movies that are partly animated and partly live action blur the line between animated film and live action film. Best to keep them under the same category.

"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon Stewart
RJSavoy Reymmã from Edinburgh Since: Apr, 2011 Relationship Status: I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me
Reymmã
#8: Aug 23rd 2012 at 4:04:41 PM

[up] Those films are very few (those I know of I can count on one hand, unless you include the likes of Avatar).

But are we defining "Film" as having a theatrical release? If so, several releases by Disney and other American companies would fit, but not the sequels which would have to go under "Western Animation". Or if we include direct-to-video under Film, what do we do with Japanese OVAs? It's awkward to separate them from the Anime folder, especially when the rest of the series is there.

A blog that gets updated on a geological timescale.
Techhead Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
#9: Aug 23rd 2012 at 11:54:03 PM

Even if you ignore OVAs, I don't remember seeing ANY Japanese animated films with theatrical releases being placed in the Film category.

edited 23rd Aug '12 11:54:50 PM by Techhead

It doesn't hurt to ask unless you're asking to be hurt.
bwburke94 Friends forevermore from uǝʌɐǝɥ Since: May, 2014 Relationship Status: RelationshipOutOfBoundsException: 1
Friends forevermore
#10: Aug 27th 2012 at 12:29:39 PM

In my opinion, Western animated films go in Film/ as do their entries on trope pages. Eastern animated films could go either way.

I had a dog-themed avatar before it was cool.
Nocturna Since: May, 2011
#11: Aug 27th 2012 at 2:46:06 PM

[up] Except that's not policy. According to policy, Western animated films are namespaced to WesternAnimation/ and belong in Film—Animated (or, at the least, Film) on trope pages. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, but that's the way it is.

Telcontar In uffish thought from England Since: Feb, 2012
In uffish thought
#12: Aug 28th 2012 at 1:45:26 AM

Where is the policy about them being in a different category on trope pages? As far as I can tell, it's something that is done differently across the site, and pages which have the separate category for Film — Animated are now being taken as policy when it makes more sense for the works to go in the Western Animation folder, to my mind. Is there a page or post we can go by to make things consistant?

That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.
lu127 Paper Master from 異界 Since: Sep, 2011 Relationship Status: Crazy Cat Lady
#13: Aug 28th 2012 at 1:57:31 AM

Here, although as noted in this post, it's rather inconsistent.

"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer
Telcontar In uffish thought from England Since: Feb, 2012
HiddenFacedMatt Avatars may be subject to change without notice. Since: Jul, 2011
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
#15: Sep 3rd 2012 at 10:36:05 AM

Bumping now because I was travelling last week.

Those films are very few
But they still exist, and their existence shows how blurry the distinction between animated and live action works really is.

But are we defining "Film" as having a theatrical release? If so, several releases by Disney and other American companies would fit, but not the sequels which would have to go under "Western Animation".
I don't recall what the official distinction between a movie and a TV show is, but I don't think it would be too unreasonable to count direct to video sequels as movies, since they are still made to be watched as movies, whereas TV shows are made to be watched as, well, TV shows.

In any case, while that does highlight a possible ambiguity with the rule, it is still not a reason to ignore the rule when it comes to animated movies that do have theatrical releases.

Or if we include direct-to-video under Film, what do we do with Japanese OV As? It's awkward to separate them from the Anime folder, especially when the rest of the series is there.
If a series spans multiple media, and comparison between different media in their versions of the series needs to be made, it might be best to just say in one folder "see also [x] folder's entry for this series." Anime series are not the only ones with that aspect; look at comparison between superhero comics and their corresponding movie adaptations, for example.

Besides, if we put anime movies in the film section, why not put manga comics in the comics section? If it were up to me there would be no "anime and manga" folder in the first place. Almost every other folder relates to which medium a given work is from. Manga and comics aren't really works from different media, just works from the same medium but for different countries. The "anime and manga" folder is the only folder for which we make such separations just because of the country of origin, and for that matter Japan is the only country whose works we separate from works from other countries. But so long as we have that distinction, why not apply it to all media from Japan?

edited 3rd Sep '12 10:47:52 AM by HiddenFacedMatt

"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon Stewart
abk0100 Since: Aug, 2011
#16: Sep 3rd 2012 at 3:37:28 PM

If it makes sense to have anime and manga in seperate folders on a page, or to have a seperate folder for anime films, I don't think there's any rule saying you can't do that. Just like there's no rule saying you can't make a "Comic book superheros" section if it makes sense to have all those examples together for some reason, like here.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#17: Sep 3rd 2012 at 4:13:45 PM

I think the main thing with keeping manga and anime in the same category is that there are tons of series that exist in both, with largely the same tropes. If you compare, say, western comics or video games with their film counterparts, the different is almst always much greater.

edited 21st Sep '12 8:30:13 AM by AnotherDuck

Check out my fanfiction!
HiddenFacedMatt Avatars may be subject to change without notice. Since: Jul, 2011
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
#18: Sep 5th 2012 at 8:13:26 PM

[up][up] I'm not sure what the official rules are on pages having unconventional sorting of examples, but I think it's something we should generally avoid, since people expecting to find their example in the folder they're used to looking in might get confused by not finding it.

[up] As I already pointed out, if a series spans multiple media, reference could be made in one folder to the corresponding entry in another. And again, it's not like anime and manga are the only media this occurs between.

"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon Stewart
HiddenFacedMatt Avatars may be subject to change without notice. Since: Jul, 2011
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
#19: Sep 20th 2012 at 4:09:32 PM

Bumping after a couple weeks, because I feel the subjects raised weren't adequately addressed, especially the part about the blurred distinction between animated films and live-action ones.

"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon Stewart
0dd1 Just awesome like that from Nowhere Land Since: Sep, 2009
Just awesome like that
#20: Apr 10th 2013 at 11:20:15 PM

Well, typically, films that use both live action and animation are just considered live-action, though I'd imagine it mostly depends on the proportionality of the two.

Insert witty and clever quip here. My page, as the database hates my handle.
Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#21: May 30th 2013 at 5:29:02 PM

I was about to ask about this topic in FAQ, but then I saw it here. I find it very frustrating to not know if an Animated Film will be in Film or Western Animation. I support a massive cleanup for this, and am in agreement with Hidden Faced Matt. Animated Films should go in Film since Film can be split into "Film—Live Action" and "Film—Animation." Also, I usually think of Western Animation being for TV shows as the animation equivalent of Live-Action TV.

If anyone after this post disagrees, we should make a crowner to decide which convention to use. Otherwise, we should go by the discussion title. Once we reach a consensus, trope pages not using the convention should be posted here for cleanup.

I'm not quite sure what should be done about Anime & Manga. I've seen some pages with Anime films in Anime & Manga, and others in Film.

edited 30th May '13 5:53:58 PM by Rethkir

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#22: Jun 25th 2013 at 5:31:28 AM

Bump. Any opinions?

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
RoninCatholic Petting Zoo Person Since: Dec, 2010
Petting Zoo Person
#23: Jul 1st 2013 at 7:10:30 PM

Anime and Manga should not be its own section. Theatrically released and direct to video animated movies made in Japan should go in Film—Animation. Televised animation made in Japan should go in Television—Animation. Manga should go in Comics.

Western animated cartoons should receive the same treatment too; theatrical and direct to video animations in Film—Animation and television animation in Television—Animation. If we go with that naming scheme Film—Live-Action and Television—Live-Action should have their names changed to match the format.

I must be cruel, but to be kind That bad may begin, and worse be left behind
Nocturna Since: May, 2011
#24: Jul 2nd 2013 at 12:04:39 AM

[up] Except that's not how it's done. For a variety of reasons. Search Wiki Talk threads for more detail. It's been discussed to death, and Anime and Manga are staying separate.

MikuruFan from Away Since: Nov, 2012
#25: Jul 2nd 2013 at 1:25:34 AM

Also fans of anime and western animation see them as distinctly individual and have a rivalry. Lumping would just cause an outrage.

I think the examples should be sorted by how they are played anyway

edited 2nd Jul '13 1:26:05 AM by MikuruFan


Total posts: 28
Top