Follow TV Tropes

Following

Narm wick kill

Go To

nuclearneo577 from My computer. Since: Dec, 2009
#1: Apr 8th 2011 at 12:05:44 PM

I need some help with it. Does anyone want to help?

nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#2: Apr 8th 2011 at 12:32:11 PM

I'd be willing to help, but I wasn't aware there was an actual policy on getting rid of links to Narm. Also, it's spelled "wick".

edited 8th Apr '11 2:57:40 PM by nrjxll

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#3: Apr 8th 2011 at 1:22:39 PM

I've always spelled it wik as in wikia, rather than wick as in candles. Do we need to kill it?

Fight smart, not fair.
melloncollie Since: Feb, 2012
#4: Apr 8th 2011 at 1:25:36 PM

I'm pretty sure Narm isn't supposed to be on any of the main/character pages, but if we are supposed remove ALL links to it (including ones on YMMV pages) I did not know about that.

edited 8th Apr '11 1:25:48 PM by melloncollie

nuclearneo577 from My computer. Since: Dec, 2009
#5: Apr 8th 2011 at 4:11:30 PM

[up]Well it is on Darth Wiki, and has the flame bait banner.

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#6: Apr 8th 2011 at 8:34:56 PM

It was moved there before we had YMMV/Audience Reaction tropes though. I think we might be able to downgrade its status to Audience Reaction as long as it's tweaked to be "this is a drama scene that made me burst out laughing" instead of "this is a drama scene Done Badly".

Fight smart, not fair.
nuclearneo577 from My computer. Since: Dec, 2009
#7: Apr 8th 2011 at 8:44:34 PM

I'm gonna PM Eddie about it.

FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#8: Apr 8th 2011 at 8:49:53 PM

Got the PM. I'd say Narm could be moved to YMMV status.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#9: Apr 8th 2011 at 9:18:19 PM

Cool. I wasn't sure, as I'd heard there were edit wars about it before my time, and it sounded like the kind of trope Audience Reaction that would get a lot of "ya-huh" "na-uh" style arguments because it was a subjective reaction rather than something objective. Should we shut this down and open a TRS to clean it? Or does it even need the full cleaning treatment*

?

edited 8th Apr '11 9:20:26 PM by Deboss

Fight smart, not fair.
SpellBlade Since: Dec, 1969
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#11: Apr 8th 2011 at 10:28:02 PM

Of course it's going to be used to complain. Any subjective trope is going to be used to complain, as people like complaining. That's why we're supposed to clean out complaining

Fight smart, not fair.
SpellBlade Since: Dec, 1969
#12: Apr 8th 2011 at 10:31:31 PM

Which makes it a natter-magnet according to What Goes Where on the Wiki.

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#13: Apr 8th 2011 at 10:43:59 PM

So were the You Fail tropes, they got renamed, rather than deleted, because there was merit to most instances, but the various Did Not Do Research subpages got deleted for being bash fests. We could hold Narm to the same standard.

Fight smart, not fair.
SpellBlade Since: Dec, 1969
#14: Apr 8th 2011 at 10:47:26 PM

The you fail tropes had a fairly objective basis, and were fixed for neutrality. Narm cannot be held to objective standards.

edited 8th Apr '11 10:47:46 PM by SpellBlade

nuclearneo577 from My computer. Since: Dec, 2009
#15: Apr 8th 2011 at 11:08:35 PM

The biggest problem with Narm is how misused the page is. I'm going to run a TRS thread to see if we can fix it up.

Add Post

Total posts: 15
Top