Let's Make it Up: Discussion

I got it at the curved nose. But this is a much more serious RP than he can handle, I'm sure...

Also, if he was using formal names, why'd he use Jeremy instead of Jeremiah?

I was thinking about saying "Jeremiah" instead, but after the reaction to "Lukas" I thought it would be easier to keep it simple. With Tobby, I was just sure that his name is an abbreviation of "Tobias".

It is, but I was just making sure. Still, Jeremiah just made sense to me. Though I do love the name Tobias. >.<

Alright, if it's not much to ask, could one of the items in the will be ownership of the room on the second floor, third door to the left and everything inside of it?

I think e X has been moving toward a "you kids now own much more than just the mansion" place. No reason there can't be a requirement for them to allow other people room and board at the mansion, and possibly access to these strange other areas. And there's not really any reason Bennet might not choose to keep some of the will to himself, for whatever purpose, revealing the bits as things go along.

You don't actually have to wait for e X to find room to talk about the will, though. You can just introduce them and then explain their connection to the mansion later. Sort of explain it away as, "Yes, you're required to let me stay here if you want to keep everything. Did you even read the document?"

Indeed, daltar. Introduce your character however you like.

edited 26th Nov '10 7:58:32 PM by AnnoR

The thing is that the character I want to play would, kind of, be part of the inheritance.

edited 26th Nov '10 7:59:48 PM by daltar

That's completely fine. Introduce something that would cause the characters to investigate the upstairs, and then go from there.

Alright, I will.

Still, I'll wait for a while before I do so, since everyone seems busy trying to make sense of what's happening.

EDIT: moot

edited 26th Nov '10 8:05:39 PM by Trickdice

daltar, if you want an introduction for your character, no problem, I gladly do it.

For the rest, he reason I kind of beat around the bush here is that I have a pretty set idea for the story as of know and I fear that I would kind of kill a lot of possibilities if I would just reveal everything I have in mind.

For example, initially I wanted Bennet to sacrifice the children to Satan for magical powers, but I like the current direction of the story with the inheritance much more than that.

edited 26th Nov '10 8:23:03 PM by eX

Thanks e X and really, everyone.

edited 26th Nov '10 8:55:11 PM by daltar

Sorry valbinoo. Samuel's getting to be paranoid in his old age. Doesn't mean you can't get in, though, just that the butler is apparently intent on having a Tom and Jerry-esque rivalry trying to keep Vic out.

Unless there's a serious problem?

Wait wait wait wait wait...

Is the blue thing in the room with them? Or is it outside?

Outside. It's slowly being introduced.

I hope you like my world building.

Kui, are you trying to get to a specific point here? because I can't even see O Oc what would be so astonishing about Earth having more than one protector.

No, I'm wondering why the other worlds have one while Earth has multiple. Not necessarily Earth having multiple in and of itself, but more why at the moment it doesn't seem to be the norm. Luke's trying to figure out the norm for this thing, however hard that might be.

Uhm, did I say somewhere that they just have one? Because that was not my intention. The idea I had was that the anchor has as many guardians as it has subrealms, since the existence of the subrealms relies on the anchor plane, the owners kinda have to defend the base.

edited 8th Dec '10 7:25:38 PM by eX

It was implied when you mentioned that Bennet had his own, and that Evelin had one as well. More implied than said, but the misunderstanding is also in-character, so it works.