Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
Those are misuse that should be cut or moved to Warp That Aesop.
Alternate Aesop Interpretation requires it be something that could reasonably exist in the setting/alongside the intended Aesop and what fans want to interpret it as. If it is something fans dislike/complain about, it is not an example because that's them rejecting that "Aesop" as opposed to re-interpreting it to their liking.
Is it just me or does the good chunk of the main entries read like citationless Unfortunate Implications? Like this example on-page: " [...]What it ended up implying was that it's important for a woman to be passive and delicate so as not to hurt her boyfriend or husband's ego, or that if her partner cheats, it's her fault for being too outspoken and/or not passive enough. It also implies that a woman, no matter how knowledgeable about how to "slay the dragon" she may be, needs a man to solve all her problems for her." or "[...]Grand personal sacrifices for others - including, but not limited to, literal suicide - are totally cool as long as you don't want anything in return."
Edited by inbeforedash