Webcomic Fun with a small caveat
Very much in the vein of Calvin And Hobbes, Sandra And Woo is the story of an eleven-year old girl, Sandra, who finds and adopts a semi-tame raccoon, Woo, only to discover it can talk. Since comparisons with a certain boy and his stuffed tiger are unavoidable, we'll make a couple. Woo, unlike Hobbes, can supposedly talk to anyone, but is deliberately hiding this from everyone except Sandra (and possibly her best friend Cloud, it's unclear). The comic delves into Sandra's relationships with Cloud and her other friend Larisa, Woo's relationships with the local wildlife, and how all of these interconnect.
Like Calvin, Sandra is aware of and not hesitant to discuss more adult issues. This is where the minor problem comes in. Whereas Calvin realistically has all kinds of misconceptions about the subjects he frequently discoursed on, Sandra and her friends seem a little too aware of the exact nature of the issues they deal with. Thankfully, their ages do not come up often, so instead of detracting from the effectiveness of the debate, it merely gives the illusion that these characters are older than they are.
Overall, it's a fairly lighthearted yet intelligent webcomic, one well worth checking out. Provided the age issue does not break the reader's Willing Suspension Of Disbelief, much enjoyment will be had.
Webcomic Sandra and Woo: New Sinfest?
So a review 12 years after the previous one by someone. Sadly, I feel that Sandra and Woo seems to be different from previous review's time. Other than schedule, I feel that the author's exploration and parody on political correctness and social justice needs to be unpacked. I get that there are annoying people, it seems that the writer isn't that well-informed and based on memes (plus South Park). Like one example is the feminist arc which not only mocked feminism but also gender identity while showing little to no idea besides an exaggerated version of it. I looked at the comment, the writer showed a dismissive and mocking attitude to critics as well. Also, the thugs resembling Pussy Riot didn't help his opinion much. Another is lava-moat arc, which I do agree with political divisiveness as of now...it feels that it repeats misinformation or right-wing talking point (like big business fomenting riots). Even it was displayed in side stuff of different stories (like German "migrants" having no idea about LGBT terms much to the chagrin of local attendent, one tennis players trying to play in men's sport via threats on the registrar for "assuming her gender", and creator's self-insert being threatened for sexual assault case before turned out to be a prank by his assistant/lover). In conclusion, I do feel that the author's foray into social issues while also possibly showing lack of knowledge besides parodies on the internet—many of which have misinformed or ignorant tone to them—might be hurting the comic along with erratic schedule.