[003]
tropelion
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
However, those tropes are regarding Dawkins work, not Dawkins himself, maybe the wording could be changed to stay \
to:
However, those tropes are regarding Dawkins work, not Dawkins himself, maybe the wording could be changed to stay \\\"his book\\\" instead of \\\"him\\\".
Furthermore, I though TV Tropes strived for factual accuracy, so it would be important as it is a fact that this work has caused controversy (I will provide links to prove it if you want). I don\\\'t see any harm in saying the case the God Delusion makes is controversial; yes it may be stepping on the toes of some of Dawkins\\\' supporters though you can\\\'t please everybody and it\\\'s controversy it is a fact whether Dawkins\\\' supporters like it or not.
So maybe just adding the word controversial before the word case. If not, then I\\\'ll leave this be.
(I am aware this is different from the last reply I sent, I changed it because I thought the previous words were too harsh).
Furthermore, I though TV Tropes strived for factual accuracy, so it would be important as it is a fact that this work has caused controversy (I will provide links to prove it if you want). I don\\\'t see any harm in saying the case the God Delusion makes is controversial; yes it may be stepping on the toes of some of Dawkins\\\' supporters though you can\\\'t please everybody and it\\\'s controversy it is a fact whether Dawkins\\\' supporters like it or not.
So maybe just adding the word controversial before the word case. If not, then I\\\'ll leave this be.
(I am aware this is different from the last reply I sent, I changed it because I thought the previous words were too harsh).
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
However, those tropes are regarding Dawkins work, not Dawkins himself, maybe the wording could be changed to stay \
to:
However, those tropes are regarding Dawkins work, not Dawkins himself, maybe the wording could be changed to stay \\\"his book\\\" instead of \\\"him\\\".
Furthermore, I though TV Tropes strived for factual accuracy, so it would be important as it is a fact that this work has caused controversy (I will provide links to prove it if you want). I don\\\'t see any harm in saying the case the God Delusion makes is controversial; yes it may be stepping on the toes of some of Dawkins\\\' supporters though you can\\\'t please everybody and it\\\'s controversy it is a fact whether Dawkins\\\' supporters like it or not.
(I am aware this is different from the last reply I sent, I changed it because I thought the previous words were too harsh).
Furthermore, I though TV Tropes strived for factual accuracy, so it would be important as it is a fact that this work has caused controversy (I will provide links to prove it if you want). I don\\\'t see any harm in saying the case the God Delusion makes is controversial; yes it may be stepping on the toes of some of Dawkins\\\' supporters though you can\\\'t please everybody and it\\\'s controversy it is a fact whether Dawkins\\\' supporters like it or not.
(I am aware this is different from the last reply I sent, I changed it because I thought the previous words were too harsh).
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
However, those tropes are regarding Dawkins work, not Dawkins himself, maybe the wording could be changed to stay \
to:
However, those tropes are regarding Dawkins work, not Dawkins himself, maybe the wording could be changed to stay \\\"his book\\\" instead of \\\"him\\\".
Furthermore, I though TV Tropes strived for factual accuracy, and it is a fact that this work has caused controversy (I will provide links to prove it if you want). I don\\\'t see any harm in saying the case the God Delusion makes is controversial; yes some of Dawkins\\\' supporters though you can\\\'t please everybody and it is a fact whether Dawkins\\\' supporters like it or not.
(I am aware this is different from the last reply I sent, I changed it because I thought the previous words were too harsh).
Furthermore, I though TV Tropes strived for factual accuracy, and it is a fact that this work has caused controversy (I will provide links to prove it if you want). I don\\\'t see any harm in saying the case the God Delusion makes is controversial; yes some of Dawkins\\\' supporters though you can\\\'t please everybody and it is a fact whether Dawkins\\\' supporters like it or not.
(I am aware this is different from the last reply I sent, I changed it because I thought the previous words were too harsh).
