[002]
AgProv
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Class One (covers quite a few blokes) - you can appreciate ladettes (sometimes known as Essex Girls or Geordie Chicks) up to a point. you can appreciate the vitality, up to a point. But after a while it\'s a complete turn-off. You ask yourself \
to:
Class One (covers quite a few blokes) - you can appreciate ladettes (sometimes known as Essex Girls or Geordie Chicks) up to a point. you can appreciate the vitality, up to a point. But after a while it\\\'s a complete turn-off. You ask yourself \\\"There are far too many incapably drunken mindless agressive or incontinent shithead drunks on the streets of \\\'\\\'{{Insert British town here}}\\\'\\\' as it is. Why add to them? And it isn\\\'t in the least bit desirable or sexual or a turn-on. It\\\'s somehow just.... ugggh\\\".
Type Two objector (the older woman who might have been a committed feminist while at university and still supports right-on causes) Ugggh. Is this really the equality we fought for while we were in our twenties, the struggle for equality between the sexes that we hoped for, dreamt of and fought for? And all younger women want to do with it is to prove they can get every bit as ratarsed and incapably drunk as men can? \\\'\\\'Our\\\'\\\' fight for women\\\'s equality boils down to \\\'\\\'their\\\'\\\' right to piss in the streets? Sometimes I wonder why we bothered...
Type Three objection (the Daily Mail reader) This is proof our country has gone to Hell in a handcart and our towns are being taken over by feral chavs who can\\\'t be counted even as working-class because I bet they haven\\\'t worked in their lives.... We should go back to the social values of the fifties where women knew how to behave in public. The 1850\\\'s for preference, but the 1950\\\'s will do...
I\\\'ve heard all three views expressed, with great vehemence...
Type Two objector (the older woman who might have been a committed feminist while at university and still supports right-on causes) Ugggh. Is this really the equality we fought for while we were in our twenties, the struggle for equality between the sexes that we hoped for, dreamt of and fought for? And all younger women want to do with it is to prove they can get every bit as ratarsed and incapably drunk as men can? \\\'\\\'Our\\\'\\\' fight for women\\\'s equality boils down to \\\'\\\'their\\\'\\\' right to piss in the streets? Sometimes I wonder why we bothered...
Type Three objection (the Daily Mail reader) This is proof our country has gone to Hell in a handcart and our towns are being taken over by feral chavs who can\\\'t be counted even as working-class because I bet they haven\\\'t worked in their lives.... We should go back to the social values of the fifties where women knew how to behave in public. The 1850\\\'s for preference, but the 1950\\\'s will do...
I\\\'ve heard all three views expressed, with great vehemence...
[001]
blackcat
MOD
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Locking the page.
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\'MODERATOR SPEAKING\\\'\\\'\\\'
Locking the page. Any further edits will have to go through [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=gsjp7dldjh2dwdelcha2hu17&page=49#1215 this thread]] since you can\\\'t have a civilized discussion. This is your only warning. Further asshattery will result in suspension.
Locking the page. Any further edits will have to go through [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=gsjp7dldjh2dwdelcha2hu17&page=49#1215 this thread]] since you can\\\'t have a civilized discussion. This is your only warning. Further asshattery will result in suspension.
