[003]
contradictioninterms
Current Version
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
One day, another user complains to you about them. They think it would be better to take the contributions like that out and concentrate on clearly describing the tropes. You don\'t really want to take out the first user\'s stuff, since they\'re a personal friend of yours (or more precisely, you ARE them), so you ask them both to discuss it, and they do! At ridiculous length, to the point of being a circular argument.
to:
One day, another user complains to you about them. They want you to take the contributions like that out and concentrate on clearly describing the tropes. You don\\\'t really want to take out the first user\\\'s stuff, since they\\\'re a personal friend of yours (or more precisely, you ARE them), so you ask them both to discuss it, and they do! At ridiculous length, to the point of being a circular argument.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
> In fact the narrative draw of the HeroicBSOD *is* the threat to the hero\'s goal that the hero himself poses(will he abandon it?).
to:
This has been a whole lot of argument, huh >_<
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
...Out of curiosity, what\'s the completely different reason that female characters\' {{HeroicBSOD}}s are compelling?
to:
Please put on your hat as a moderator, or at least the person who is taking ownership of this page.
There is a user who has made a bunch of edits to other pages stressing how badly men are treated and how much of a disadvantage they are at. This user has added a lot of their own ideas to your index page about gender dynamics, like that society feels that men who can\\\'t protect themselves deserve to be beaten and so on.
One day, another user complains to you about them. They think it would be better to take the contributions like that out and concentrate on clearly describing the tropes. You don\\\'t really want to take out the first user\\\'s stuff, since they\\\'re a personal friend of yours (or more precisely, you ARE them), so you ask them both to discuss it, and they do! At ridiculous length, to the point of being a circular argument.
But, sooner or later, you have to decide in favour of one or the other.
Which one?
There is a user who has made a bunch of edits to other pages stressing how badly men are treated and how much of a disadvantage they are at. This user has added a lot of their own ideas to your index page about gender dynamics, like that society feels that men who can\\\'t protect themselves deserve to be beaten and so on.
One day, another user complains to you about them. They think it would be better to take the contributions like that out and concentrate on clearly describing the tropes. You don\\\'t really want to take out the first user\\\'s stuff, since they\\\'re a personal friend of yours (or more precisely, you ARE them), so you ask them both to discuss it, and they do! At ridiculous length, to the point of being a circular argument.
But, sooner or later, you have to decide in favour of one or the other.
Which one?
