[002]
MAI742
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The Holocaust is not an example of this trope in real life, although it is in some media and extremely poorly researched 'academic' works. Consequently, I will remove it.
Does anyone disagree?
Does anyone disagree?
to:
Edit: nevermind. How do you delete one of these, I wonder?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
You have to follow the universe's law as it is written. We see this in Rise from the Ashes with Lana Skye, and we see it in Case 5 when Shi Long Lang mentions it. They are removed from investigative authority when they are suspects for murder.
to:
You have to follow the universe\'s law as it is written. We see this in Rise from the Ashes with Lana Skye, and we see it in Case 5 when Shi Long Lang mentions it. They are removed from investigative authority when they are suspects for murder.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
In regards to
to:
In regards to \"forged evidence\" being introduced by Gavin, I have to say you must be completely bonkers. Neither Gavin introduced forged evidence: Kristoph commissioned the forgery, but he wasn\'t disbarred for it: Phoenix was disbarred for submitting it.
Justine introduces two piece of fabricated evidence: The letter that was in Jill Crane\'s pocket (that couldn\'t have existed because of the candleabra) and the forged autopsy report (while it was Bonnie Young that did the actual forgery, it was Justine who used the evidence). Even if you try to ignore the latter, the former evidence is planted. It\'s refuted by basic physics.
When you couple this with the fact that Justine did not admit to the keycard record (and gives a shoddy excuse as to her lack of motive, particularly when Justine used fabricated evidence to give a motive to Kay), there\'s some serious legal shennigans here. By the Phoenix standard, she would have been completely disbarred.
When Kay is arrested, Justine specifically uses the letter as a motive, claiming the two of them had a meeting. However, that evidence has already been proven to be a fabrication (Justine was even there when it was proven). That\'s exactly what was used to disbar Phoenix: Using fabricated evidence. Justine did it, she wasn\'t punished.
The idea that Justine is punished by having her son kidnapped has nothing to do with the case, he wasn\'t kidnapped because of anything related to Justine\'s forgery, that was to get a specific verdict.
It sounds to me like you just flat out don\'t want to consider the fabricated evidence. But she did do it.
Justine introduces two piece of fabricated evidence: The letter that was in Jill Crane\'s pocket (that couldn\'t have existed because of the candleabra) and the forged autopsy report (while it was Bonnie Young that did the actual forgery, it was Justine who used the evidence). Even if you try to ignore the latter, the former evidence is planted. It\'s refuted by basic physics.
When you couple this with the fact that Justine did not admit to the keycard record (and gives a shoddy excuse as to her lack of motive, particularly when Justine used fabricated evidence to give a motive to Kay), there\'s some serious legal shennigans here. By the Phoenix standard, she would have been completely disbarred.
When Kay is arrested, Justine specifically uses the letter as a motive, claiming the two of them had a meeting. However, that evidence has already been proven to be a fabrication (Justine was even there when it was proven). That\'s exactly what was used to disbar Phoenix: Using fabricated evidence. Justine did it, she wasn\'t punished.
The idea that Justine is punished by having her son kidnapped has nothing to do with the case, he wasn\'t kidnapped because of anything related to Justine\'s forgery, that was to get a specific verdict.
It sounds to me like you just flat out don\'t want to consider the fabricated evidence. But she did do it.
