Follow TV Tropes

Following

Unofficial Product Placement

Go To

Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the Retromancer
#1: Feb 7th 2024 at 2:46:40 AM

Product Placement has a requirement that it should be paid sponsorship. The examples that acknowledge that can be counted by hand. While it's a logical assumption that putting a copyrighted object would require licensing, some don't, so the trope is used as basically "The work averts Bland-Name Product or Product Displacement".

  • Isn't that a scope issue?
  • Wouldn't paid sponsorship be more on production/Trivia side?

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
DoktorvonEurotrash Since: Jan, 2001
#2: Feb 7th 2024 at 5:49:29 AM

I agree, that seems really difficult to verify.

Nen_desharu Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire from Greater Smash Bros. Universe or Toronto Since: Aug, 2020 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire
#3: Feb 7th 2024 at 7:54:58 AM

By the way the trope is worded, it is hard to tell the difference between actual paid sponsorships and simple shout-outs to real-world products and services.

Kirby is awesome.
DoktorvonEurotrash Since: Jan, 2001
#4: Feb 7th 2024 at 8:31:39 AM

[up]You're right, and the second type really shouldn't fall under this trope at all.

I'm not saying "writers add real-world brand for verisimilitude" isn't a trope, but I've never heard anyone use the phrase Product Placement and not refer to the in-your-face, sponsored variety.

Add Post

Total posts: 4
Top