DoktorvonEurotrash
Since: Jan, 2001
#2: Feb 7th 2024 at 5:49:29 AM
I agree, that seems really difficult to verify.
Nen_desharu
Nintendo Fanatic Extraordinaire
from Greater Smash Bros. Universe or Toronto
Since: Aug, 2020
Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#3: Feb 7th 2024 at 7:54:58 AM
By the way the trope is worded, it is hard to tell the difference between actual paid sponsorships and simple shout-outs to real-world products and services.
Kirby is awesome.
DoktorvonEurotrash
Since: Jan, 2001
#4: Feb 7th 2024 at 8:31:39 AM
You're right, and the second type really shouldn't fall under this trope at all.
I'm not saying "writers add real-world brand for verisimilitude" isn't a trope, but I've never heard anyone use the phrase Product Placement and not refer to the in-your-face, sponsored variety.
Total posts: 4
Product Placement has a requirement that it should be paid sponsorship. The examples that acknowledge that can be counted by hand. While it's a logical assumption that putting a copyrighted object would require licensing, some don't, so the trope is used as basically "The work averts Bland-Name Product or Product Displacement".
- Isn't that a scope issue?
- Wouldn't paid sponsorship be more on production/Trivia side?
TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup