This is a thread to discuss those Administrivia pages in need of a little updating- you know the ones. The ones that still cite rules we've long since changed, or the ones that don't properly cite our current standards. Some of them are even scattered in Main/!
So, this is the place to take those pages and fix them up with the help of the community.
For a list of current projects, see Outdated Administrivia Pages.
Note: This thread is not for asking mods to make one-off edits to Locked Pages, Administrivia-related or otherwise, such as requesting additions to an Example Sectionectomy index. Please use this thread for that.
Edited by GastonRabbit on Apr 21st 2023 at 9:12:02 AM
Also, in my opinion, Flame Bait should also be in the Administrivia namespace. It is a policy page of tropes to avoid mentioning anywhere on the wiki (although it can also refer to anything that can cause a Flame War in general).
Edited by FridgeGuy2016 on Sep 6th 2019 at 3:13:46 AM
Limpin' with the bizkit.On https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/family_friendly.php, the first "the" shouldn't be capitalized. Also, the part about marking "mature content" should be removed since we no longer have a curtain for mature content, and part of it should be reworded as "We can talk about media which is racy. We just can't be the racy media." to remove awkward parentheses.
Keet cleanupI...have never even seen that page.
It also isn't a typical wiki page, so that's not something a mod could edit.
It's very strange. Must be a very old holdover from the past.
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessPinging ~drewski and ~itcdr since it looks like that page requires an admin to edit it. By the way, Family Friendly redirects there.
Keet cleanupIs it even worth keeping? We can say basically the same thing on No Lewdness, No Prudishness just as easily.
Edited by WarJay77 on Sep 13th 2019 at 6:17:47 AM
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessTo me, the term "Family Friendly" is a farce when we discuss a number of topics that are decided not family-friendly by their very nature. Maybe "safe for work" would be a better term, since young children probably shouldn't be on this website? Otherwise, it's time to send Gag Boobs, Compensating for Something, South Park, and High School Dx D to the Cut List.
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!That's also true.
This page is probably the most outdated of the outdated. It's like an ancient relic. We're just fine without it, and we could easily make a new, better page.
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessShould Pages Needing Images and List Of Shows That Need Summary also be moved to Administrivia? I also never liked the latter name; perhaps move it to something like Works Needing Pages?
Keet cleanupPlease put Tropes Are Tools in the Administrivia namespace. It is a policy page that is for some reason in the Main namespace.
Limpin' with the bizkit.Found another page that should be administrivia: Walkthrough Mode
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessAlso, A Guide to Easy Launching of Your TLP has this line:
- Don't hit the launch button until you have the page up. That way, you can avoid the "Blank launch" problem.
This is a holdover from an older time and should be removed.
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessMoved those pages to Administrivia, except for Walkthrough Mode, which seems to be serving a similar purpose to Wall of Text.
Just a reminder that I have this thread pinned, but am not necessarily going to be staying on top of stuff.
So, should we repoint all the Main.Tropes Are Tools redirects to the Administrivia version?
Or make Administrivia versions of them or something?
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/relatedsearch.php?term=Main/TropesAreTools
Disambig Needed: Help with those issues! tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13324299140A37493800&page=24#comment-576I'd say make Administrivia duplicates of them and then point them all to Administrivia.Tropes Are Tools to maintain any old links makes on the forums and such.
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!I changed Tropes Are Not Bad and Tropes Are Not Good to redirect to Administrivia; the others have no wicks, and I don't see the need to create Administrivia duplicate redirects.
Keet cleanupCutting the un-re-targetted ones as low use.
Disambig Needed: Help with those issues! tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13324299140A37493800&page=24#comment-576Doesn't anyone think Pot Hole should be more descriptive with when they are and aren't necessary?
Limpin' with the bizkit.- What do you suggest?
Change the minimum to a certain fraction of a percent of the number of catalogued works?
Change it to the nice round number of 20?
Edited by Malady on Oct 12th 2019 at 4:04:00 AM
Disambig Needed: Help with those issues! tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13324299140A37493800&page=24#comment-576On How to Pick a Good Image, aren't all images supposed to be on the right side now?
- Pages with quotes should have the image on the right side (you can learn how to do this on Text-Formatting Rules).
- If the image is rather tall, move it to the right as well.
Subjective Tropes seems to be outdated, since there are such things as actual tropes (not Audience Reactions) which go on a work's YMMV page. For example, Complete Monster and The Woobie.
If it were up to me, I'd find a way to make these tropes objective, but as it stands it's incorrect to say "A trope is either objectively there or it is not there".
I made some tweaks to Zero-Context Example to improve sentence flow, apply consistent use of pronouns, and organize the list from least-to-most in terms of explanation. I also added another "good" example, put in dividing lines, and added Show, Don't Tell to the "See Also" section.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"