Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Per the site owner, AI generated images are allowed on TV Tropes and will be treated just like regular images.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by kory on May 2nd 2024 at 11:16:14 AM

suedenim Teutonic Tomboy T-Girl from Jet Dream HQ Since: Oct, 2009
Teutonic Tomboy T-Girl
#26: Oct 10th 2011 at 6:58:05 AM

I'd be in favor of a more nuanced approach to LOL Cats and possibly the occasional demotivator (though they have the added problem of virtually always becoming illegible at 350 pixels), but Fast Eddie's policy seems to be "nuke on sight" for those categories.

Jet-a-Reeno!
FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#27: Oct 10th 2011 at 9:08:29 AM

It is hard to get mobs of editors to do nuance. Things like meme images are not worth the time.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#28: Oct 10th 2011 at 10:00:23 AM

It's a clear and succinct guideline, I think this is a good addition to the forum.

My proverbial two cents,

  • For the sake of clarity, please either spell out or link acronyms like NSFW and JAFAAC.

  • I would like to add a line stating that if a page has no image, then you can go ahead and add one without starting a thread (unless, of course, the page has a notice that tells you not to). Likewise, please point out that if a page has an image, don't replace it without discussion first (unless it's an instant pull). By the way, if you do an instant pull, should you make a IP thread to indicate you've done so?

  • The line for "if you have a suggestion" should add that you need to have an actual picture to show in your first post, not just a vague line like "wouldn't it be cool if..."

  • I think the three criteria about copyright ("is copyrighted in a manner", "is an entire strip", and "is a deviantART") should be grouped together, probably as sub-bullets. Furthermore, I would like to have clarified what is meant by the latter; I was not under the impression that we normally ask for permission to show e.g. a screencap or part of a webcomic, so where is the line?

  • I'm not sure why "over the size limit" needs to be listed here, considering the uploader doesn't let you upload such pictures in the first place. If anything, it belongs under "not valid reasons to start a thread" because it doesn't need a thread, you can just shrink and replace.

  • Finally, are animated GI Fs allowed?

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
Ultimatum Disasturbator from Second Star to the left (Old as dirt) Relationship Status: Wishfully thinking
troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#30: Oct 10th 2011 at 3:50:12 PM

Animated .gifs are allowed on Image Links but cannot be uploaded as page images.

Rhymes with "Protracted."
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#31: Oct 10th 2011 at 4:31:28 PM

[up][up][up] To your next-to-last point - there are still pics floating around that are over the size limit that were put on pages before the uploader had the limit set; I changed one a coupla days ago. I potholed NSFW and JAFAAC.

EDIT: Alright, I think I got everything you mentioned. To the question about parts of a strip - I know we've had this discussion multiple times, I just can't remember where.

edited 10th Oct '11 5:06:36 PM by Willbyr

Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#32: Oct 11th 2011 at 3:31:06 AM

Looks good.

I would prefer if an explanatory sticky didn't use those little stars that you have to click on to expand them. If the information is important (and I think it is), it shouldn't be hidden like that; if the information is not important, then it shouldn't be there.

Also, I have no idea what "Reaction Guys" are.

Why aren't we allowed to start a discussion thread on a page marked as "no picture"? Surely we can change our mind about such pages at some point?

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#33: Oct 11th 2011 at 4:31:39 AM

[up] Usually if a page is tagged "no pic", it's by admin decree. There may be some pages floating around that are tagged "not pictureable"...those should have an IP thread tagged on them for reference.

I can't rememeber the trope page that the pic is on but the Reaction Guys are the dudes on the couch who are looking "meh" in relation to one pic and "YAY!" in relation to another.

I don't mind the hottips, but I'll tinker around with the formatting later on today.

edited 11th Oct '11 4:32:56 AM by Willbyr

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#34: Oct 11th 2011 at 7:38:24 AM

Alright, finished with the latest round of edits. I moved the "no page pic" part to its own section since, IIRC, there have been cases where someone's found or made a pic that has worked for either of those instances...could be wrong, and if that's the case, I'll move it back.

edited 11th Oct '11 7:39:02 AM by Willbyr

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#36: Oct 11th 2011 at 8:58:59 AM

Cool; I split that line to its own sub-bullet and added that link and a reference to Real Women Never Wear Dresses since that page uses them. There's others, aren't there?

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#37: Oct 11th 2011 at 9:23:43 AM

Good god, that's a lot of description on that page.

Fight smart, not fair.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#38: Oct 11th 2011 at 10:00:14 AM

[up] An admitted problem of mine...I'm working on un-SL'ing it right now. That being said, I'd rather it be long and clear than over-concise and too vague.

EDIT: Alright, trimmed some fat...better?

edited 11th Oct '11 10:14:15 AM by Willbyr

JapaneseTeeth Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing from Meinong's jungle Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Mu
Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#40: Oct 11th 2011 at 5:54:46 PM

A lot of back and forth. Analysis and all that.

Fight smart, not fair.
FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#41: Oct 12th 2011 at 7:47:53 AM

I made some changes to the OP.

  • Deviant Art is no different than any other source. No need to have an item about it.
  • Images that work because of speech bubble text are fine.
  • Great captions are great. We can't have a rule that says "It only works because of the caption, it's out."
  • Example Indentation was b0rked. Can't have that in a document about policy, for sure.

edited 12th Oct '11 7:48:49 AM by FastEddie

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#42: Oct 12th 2011 at 10:23:05 AM

Nevermind

edited 12th Oct '11 10:24:25 AM by Willbyr

troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#43: Oct 12th 2011 at 8:02:22 PM

If Image Pickin' decides a trope is unpicturable, you don't need staff permission to start a new thread. It's the same as starting a thread for any other trope that has a pre-existing IP decision—come bearing better suggestions or be shot down.

Rhymes with "Protracted."
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#44: Oct 13th 2011 at 4:13:01 AM

[up] Yeah, I've been debating how to address that...that section probably just needs to be called "Special cases" and the part about talking to the higher-ups made a criteria for the "admin request"...heading off to edit.

EDIT: Done.

I'm wondering if something about a page that's had multiple threads about its pic (like The Wesley) should be made another special case...maybe "If a page has had multiple threads yet kept its pic, it's probably not worth making another thread unless you've got a slam-dunk replacement in mind".

edited 13th Oct '11 4:20:24 AM by Willbyr

JapaneseTeeth Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing from Meinong's jungle Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Mu
Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing
#45: Oct 13th 2011 at 7:24:20 AM

[up]I don't think there's really such a thing as a "slam dunk replacement", at the very least you can't really tell until people comment on it. I've seen a few threads where somebody goes "Guy, I have the perfect picture for this", only for overwhelming consensus to be for keeping the old picture.

That and with the number of threads we have going, our priority is replacing pictures that are actually bad or adding pictures where there are none. Replacing pictures that already work okay is a secondary goal, especially if it's a page that's likely to take forever without getting anywhere. I don't think it's worth the trouble.

Reaction Image Repository
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#46: Oct 13th 2011 at 9:31:36 AM

[up] True on all accounts...it's not gonna bug me to not have that on the list, but I figured it's worth discussing.

Catalogue A pocketful of saudade. from where the good times are Since: Sep, 2009
A pocketful of saudade.
#47: Dec 29th 2011 at 12:46:18 AM

Real Women Don't Wear Dresses doesn't use the Reaction Guys anymore.

The words above are to be read as if they are narrated by Morgan Freeman.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#49: Dec 30th 2011 at 7:28:02 AM

[up][up], [up]: Noted and changed.

lamoxlamae Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In Spades with myself
#50: Dec 31st 2011 at 11:22:55 PM

Can someone give me some feedback on a sticky Image Pickin' situation?

On Everybody Wants the Hermaphrodite an image pickin' thread was launched and someone pulled the image the same day. The image was SFW, not watermarked, not a spoiler, and not a demotivator, however, someone contested it as a possible JAFAAC which is why the thread was made.

I put it back as it was not pulled for any of the "instant pull" reasons and it was pulled before a full discussion could be had on the subject. Someone pulled it again within a couple hours even though a full decision has not been made yet.

Should I put it back again or should the image pull be allowed to stay even though the discussion is still going on and the image was pulled without meeting the instant pull criteria?

I'm afraid to put it back as someone may just remove it again and I don't want to start an edit war. If added back, what should be done to prevent things from being pulled prematurely again?

What should the proper protocol be on this one, guys?

If it helps anything, here's the discussion page (pardon messy link) https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1324250965076171100

edited 31st Dec '11 11:37:42 PM by lamoxlamae


Total posts: 9,739
Top