Let's Be Comfortable With Our Sexuality: Xchange 2!

I...this game...randomly exploding machine...how the fuck do you not know what a pilot is, much less a headset...I...what

This'll be good.

^Lmao.

edited 30th Nov '10 4:14:26 PM by BlackDove

Oh man, this is hillarious.

I am reading this and my god is laughing at me. ._.

updates plz

Did Faw die from the horrible? ._.

nah, his hands are obviously otherwise occupied.

^ I see what you did there.

Thank you for that mental image.

Dude, he wants to be 170 cm?

That's like... Short. I mean, like, 10 cm's below average short.

Arilou: The average Japanese male is only about 170 cm. They generally aren't as tall as Northern Europeans.

edited 4th Dec '10 4:41:47 AM by Ponicalica

Great, now I feel short.

I seem to remember hearing about this series beforehand, but I didn't hear anything about it being bad.

I seem to remember hearing about this series beforehand, but I didn't hear anything about it being bad.

I MEAN.

Oh god guys I'm not sure if I can go on playing this game I just can't take the moral implications of a girl who is actually a guy being forced into sex and finding himself unable to resist as he's drawn further and further into the vortex of hot and sweaty lust as all social standards of good or bad or beauty and ugliness are ripped from his consciousness and all that exists in this world of passion is

uh

...

Oh yeah this game.

I guess I might continue this thread at some point hahahaha

PS: Spoilers

the orgy bus makes a return

Oddly enough, I think there's a pornsite like that, ...Or So I Heard.

Well, yesno.

I mean.

I would have no idea what you're talking about whatsoever sir.

I DEMAND SCENES OF QUESTIONABLE TASTE.

This game sounds AWESOME. Exactly the right kind of silly that fits my sense of humour, and the Deadpan Snarker protagonist is just cherry on top.

Fawriel!

The power of Christ compels you to continue this liveblog!

So far everything in this H-game is decidedly non-arousing, made worse by the bad art. You sure this is supposed to be good?

So far, I must say, I think that this is quite good. Not the kind of game for everyone, of course, but it seems to have fairly decent art and style. Plus, I must admit to chuckling at the game's dialogue, and not just the comments of our wonderful blogger. If this recieves an update, I certainly wouldn't mind.

...By the way, Fawriel, I kinda-sorta-maybe borrowed what you said in Post #1 and made a page for the series out of it. I hope I can be forgiven for what may or may not be plagiarism.

I'm not sure if we're actually supposed to have that sort of thing on the site or not, anymore... The whole Google Ads issue. It's safe to have it here in the forums, I just don't know about the wiki (I'm not saying to take it down. Personally I'm a bit upset about the whole kerfuffle but ya gotta make the advertisers happy).

Anyway, everything I've heard about this game has been bad. I'm told the original X-Change had a horrible system that required you to effectively pixelhunt like a Sierra game player, and then there's the plot. Also, reviews I've found on it indicate it's basically the exception that follows the rule everyone "knows" about h-games, that is to say, that they are all about the sex and not merely peppered with it.

Therefore I will look to see where this goes, but mostly out of morbid curiosity.

edited 9th Dec '10 6:40:05 AM by GoggleFox

None of these sorts of liveblogs seem to last very long.

By "these sorts" do you mean terrible h-games? Because that makes sense. There's usually not much one can say. "And then they fuck" can only be said so many times.

edited 9th Dec '10 11:19:46 AM by GoggleFox

Goggle Fox, Not-Safe-For-Google content like the fora is cordoned off in a section with a different ad provider, so it's no big deal. You can observe this yourself by logging out and trying to view the fora.

Like the fora, yes. I'm aware of this. However I'm not sure if the wiki is safe to host not-google-safe content on.

A quick search and pulling up the relevant page later, I find google ads on said page so I'm again uncertain.

edited 9th Dec '10 11:47:31 AM by GoggleFox