Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / GlassCannon

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/GhostRiderSpiritOfVengeance'': Roarke compares himself to a flamethrower made of paper while explaining to Danny about his powers; he is unable to use his full power while in the human world because of his fragile human body. [[spoiler:Thus, he needs to possess Danny, the boy being his son and all.]]

to:

* ''Film/GhostRiderSpiritOfVengeance'': Roarke compares himself to a flamethrower made of paper while [[ExplainingYourPowerToTheEnemy explaining to Danny about his powers; powers]]; he is unable to use his full power while in the human world because of his fragile human body. [[spoiler:Thus, he needs to possess Danny, the boy being his son and all.]]



** ''Film/GuardiansOfTheGalaxyVol3'': The High Evolutionary's gravity powers are undoubtedly deadly -- they can annihilate an entire roomful of enemies in a SphereOfDestruction at maximum output -- but they (and his combat skills in general) are so crude and simple that they offer him zero defensive options. Once you get past that, he's a lightly-armoured HumanAlien with perfectly ordinary durability and pain tolerance -- which is even more of a problem than it sounds, since being a GravityMaster apparently requires some level of concentration on his part. Any reasonably serious injury will distract him so much that he essentially loses any meaningful ability to fight back against whoever injured him, leaving him entirely dependent on his first-strike capabilities. There's a reason his "fight" against the Guardians can be summarised as "Rocket shoots him, and then a NoHoldsBarredBeatdown ensues".

to:

** ''Film/GuardiansOfTheGalaxyVol3'': The High Evolutionary's gravity powers are undoubtedly deadly -- they can annihilate an entire roomful of enemies in a SphereOfDestruction at maximum output -- but they (and his combat skills in general) are so crude and simple that they offer him zero defensive options. Once you get past that, he's a lightly-armoured HumanAlien {{Human Alien|s}} with perfectly ordinary durability and pain tolerance -- which is even more of a problem than it sounds, since being a GravityMaster apparently requires some level of concentration on his part. Any reasonably serious injury will distract him so much that he essentially loses any meaningful ability to fight back against whoever injured him, leaving him entirely dependent on his first-strike capabilities. There's a reason his "fight" against the Guardians can be summarised as "Rocket shoots him, and then a NoHoldsBarredBeatdown ensues".

Added: 351

Removed: 328

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The direct inverse of StoneWall, who takes it but can't dish it out.
* Compare and contrast MightyGlacier, who can dish out at the expense of speed rather than toughness, and LightningBruiser, who can do the same without sacrificing anything (or sacrificing a "secondary" characteristic, such as [[CloseRangeCombatant range]]).


Added DiffLines:

OppositeTrope of StoneWall, which has very high survivability, but can't scratch any opponent. Compare and contrast MightyGlacier, who can dish out at the expense of speed rather than toughness, and LightningBruiser, who can do the same without sacrificing anything (or sacrificing a "secondary" characteristic, such as [[CloseRangeCombatant range]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** In the 1930s, the Soviet Union experimented with mounting rockets on tanks, producing [[http://epizodsspace.airbase.ru/bibl/shirokorad/ot-min/244.jpg this monstrosity]]. Due to several defects with the design (namely horrifying lack of accuracy), it was never put into production.

to:

*** In the 1930s, the Soviet Union experimented with mounting rockets on tanks, producing [[http://epizodsspace.airbase.ru/bibl/shirokorad/ot-min/244.jpg this monstrosity]].monstrosity]], a BT-5 with a pair of rockets that for some reason were referred to as "tank torpedoes". Due to several defects with the design (namely horrifying lack of accuracy), it was never put into production.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
1) Bad indentation 2) If a character is "statistically a Lightning Bruiser", but in practice are squishy, then they aren't a Lightning Bruiser at all, since these tropes exist relative to other characters in the work and aren't determined by just stats in a vacuum.


** A statistical LightningBruiser can also [[Administrivia/TropesAreFlexible become a practical Glass Cannon]] in a game where enemies keep attacking the player character and where MercyInvincibility doesn't exist, making their defense and LifeMeter near-pointless.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Israeli upgrades of their remaining M4 Shermans resulted in the M-50 and M-51 Super Shermans. The M-50s received longer-barreled and more powerful 75mm guns from French AMX-13 light tanks and the M-51 had ''105mm'' L7 guns cut down to 51 calibers. The latter especially were able to knock out any armor they encountered, but were able to be easily knocked out in turn because of their somewhat-weak for WWII era armor during the Six-Day War and Yom Kippur War.

Changed: 249

Removed: 247

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



->''"I'm the caster, y'know! It's like I'm a cannon made out of glass. Like a...y'know, like a dainty figurine so ornately decorated you can't imagine how something so fragile manages to exist in this brutal, ugly world...and it makes you weep."''

to:

\n->''"I'm the caster, y'know! It's like I'm a cannon made out of glass. Like a... y'know, like a dainty figurine so ornately decorated you can't imagine how something so fragile manages to exist in this brutal, ugly world...world... and it makes you weep."''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** ''Film/GuardiansOfTheGalaxyVol3'': The High Evolutionary's gravity powers are undoubtedly deadly -- they can annihilate an entire roomful of enemies in a SphereOfDestruction at maximum output -- but they (and his combat skills in general) are so crude and simple that they offer him zero defensive options. Once you get past that, he's a lightly-armoured HumanAlien with perfectly ordinary durability and pain tolerance -- which is even more of a problem than it sounds, since being a GravityMaster apparently requires some level of concentration on his part. Any reasonably serious injury will distract him so much that he essentially loses any meaningful ability to fight back against whoever injured him, leaving him entirely dependent on his first-strike capabilities. There's a reason his "fight" against the Guardians can be summarised as "Rocket shoots him, and then a NoHoldsBarredBeatdown ensues".

Added: 202

Changed: 104

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:256:[[VisualPun Frail, but deadly.]]]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:256:[[VisualPun Frail, but deadly.]]]][[caption-width-right:256:Though its ammo is pricey, the [[CrystalBall Crystal Cannon Balls]] never miss.]]




to:

%%
%% Caption selected per above IP thread. Please do not replace or remove without further discussion in the Caption Repair thread:
%% https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1404492079030138900
%%
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:306:[[VisualPun Frail, but deadly.]]]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:306:[[VisualPun [[caption-width-right:256:[[VisualPun Frail, but deadly.]]]]

Added: 148

Changed: 66

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


%% Image selected per Image Pickin' thread: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1655450810083676100

to:

%% Image selected per Image Pickin' thread: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=16980863240.81136600
%% Previous thread: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.
php?discussion=1655450810083676100



%%



%% Do NOT start a thread without a replacement suggestion.



[[quoteright:306:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/glasscannon_5812.jpg]]

to:

[[quoteright:306:https://static.[[quoteright:256:[[VideoGame/BattleNations https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/glasscannon_5812.jpg]]org/pmwiki/pub/images/glasscanon.png]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[JustForFun/IThoughtItMeant Not to be confused with]] actual cannons made of glass, which would be its TropeNamer. For those, see GlassWeapon.

to:

[[JustForFun/IThoughtItMeant Not to be confused with]] actual cannons made of glass, which would be its TropeNamer.{{Trope Namer|s}}. For those, see GlassWeapon.



* ''Franchise/{{Rocky}}'';

to:

* ''Franchise/{{Rocky}}'';''Franchise/{{Rocky}}'':



-->'''AJ''': ''(in response to Dave calling him a SpotMonkey)'' I think it's funny that a guy who takes a bump and tears his back tells me I don't know how to wrestle.

to:

-->'''AJ''': ''(in (in response to Dave calling him a SpotMonkey)'' SpotMonkey) I think it's funny that a guy who takes a bump and tears his back tells me I don't know how to wrestle.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Film/BackToTheFuture'', George is a lanky kid who gets manhandled pretty easily by the much taller and burlier Biff, but when he finally gets serious he one-shots Biff with a single punch.

to:

* In ''Film/BackToTheFuture'', ''Film/BackToTheFuture1'', George is a lanky kid who gets manhandled pretty easily by the much taller and burlier Biff, but when he finally gets serious he one-shots Biff with a single punch.

Added: 1346

Changed: 709

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Film/RockyIII'', Rocky’s opponent Clubber Lang is ultimately a variation of this, with his weakness being stamina rather than defence. While Lang is a powerful fighter who hits hard and generally demolishes his opponents quickly, his reliance on this strategy means that he puts too much power into his initial assaults. He defeats Rocky in their first bout because Rocky was out of practice and emotionally shaken by his manager’s recent fatal heart attack, but when they engage in a rematch Rocky has worked hard to get back in shape and manages to provoke Lang into a rage where he makes mistakes, resulting in Lang exhausting himself while Rocky utilises his greater endurance to strike back and win.

to:

* ''Franchise/{{Rocky}}'';
** Apollo Creed is strong, fast, and has decent stamina but can't take lots of punishment. It should be noted that this is a downplayed version to the usual; Apollo doesn't really have a glass jaw, but his ability to take damage is merely average compared to Rocky’s more impressive ability to absorb his opponents’ blows and keep standing even against overwhelming odds. Apollo was strong enough to deal with most opponents in the ring before this became an issue, but Rocky [[spoiler:and Drago]] were durable enough to hold out against Apollo’s earlier blows and do more serious damage later when he was less prepared to fight back.
**
In ''Film/RockyIII'', Rocky’s opponent Clubber Lang is ultimately a variation of this, with his weakness being stamina rather than defence. While Lang is a powerful fighter who hits hard and generally demolishes his opponents quickly, his reliance on this strategy means that he puts too much power into his initial assaults. He defeats Rocky in their first bout because Rocky was out of practice and emotionally shaken by his manager’s recent fatal heart attack, but when they engage in a rematch Rocky has worked hard to get back in shape and manages to provoke Lang into a rage where he makes mistakes, resulting in Lang exhausting himself while Rocky utilises his greater endurance to strike back and win.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''Film/RockyIII'', Rocky’s opponent Clubber Lang is ultimately a variation of this, with his weakness being stamina rather than defence. While Lang is a powerful fighter who hits hard and generally demolishes his opponents quickly, his reliance on this strategy means that he puts too much power into his initial assaults. He defeats Rocky in their first bout because Rocky was out of practice and emotionally shaken by his manager’s recent fatal heart attack, but when they engage in a rematch Rocky has worked hard to get back in shape and manages to provoke Lang into a rage where he makes mistakes, resulting in Lang exhausting himself while Rocky utilises his greater endurance to strike back and win.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In motor racing, it is not untold of teams which were very competitive but struggled in reliability. For example, in Formula 1 known examples were the Williams-Renault of 1991 and the Mclaren-Mercedes of 2005: by far the fastest cars on track, but afflicted by technical issues that costed many retirements, ultimately giving up the title to their opponents (respectively Mclaren-Honda and Renault). This mostly because innovative designs can result in high performance but also increased fragility until enough development is done through seasons, but also because sometimes high performance puts more stress to technical components which are more prone to failure. In these examples, Williams managed to become one of the dominant forces of the 90s starting from 1992 when it achieved both speed and reliability.

Added: 70

Changed: 68

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Also often overlaps with LongRangeFighter, using range to keep out of harm's way. The direct inverse of StoneWall, who takes it but can't dish it out.

to:

* Also often overlaps with LongRangeFighter, using range to keep out of harm's way.
*
The direct inverse of StoneWall, who takes it but can't dish it out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''WesternAnimation/{{Moana}}'', demi-god Maui becomes this by the time of the final battle with Te Kā, as his hook- the source of his power- was damaged in a previous battle, so that all it would take is one good hit to destroy it for good. Fortunately, Maui is fast and strong enough that he manages to hold Te Kā back for some time even with that particular weakness to take into account.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Though the German and Soviet tank destroyers tended to go in the opposite direction, with [[MightyGlacier heavy armour and powerful guns with limited traverse]], they also produced a large number of lightly-armoured, open-topped self-propelled guns which were often used to take out enemy armour. In the case of Germany, some of these were specifically designed and pressed into service as tank destroyers, following their encounters with superior Soviet armour.

to:

** Though the German and Soviet tank destroyers tended to go in the opposite direction, with [[MightyGlacier heavy armour and powerful guns guns]] with [[FixedForwardFacingWeapon limited traverse]], they also produced a large number of lightly-armoured, open-topped self-propelled guns which were often used to take out enemy armour. In the case of Germany, some of these were specifically designed and pressed into service as tank destroyers, following their encounters with superior Soviet armour.

Changed: 286

Removed: 33

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The Vickers Medium Mk.II, designed in 1925, was armed with a 47mm anti-tank gun (and as such, were among the best-armed tanks of the time) but only had 8mm of armour. By comparison, the WWI-era Whippet had 18mm. The design was due to the doctrine that the best tool to fight a tank was another tank, and that armour was essentially for defence from small-arms fire (against which it was fitted with machine-guns). The Medium II was designed to replace both the WWI-era medium and heavy tanks, to break through the the enemy line and then exploit the rear, destroying headquarters, artillery parks, etc. while taking prisoners.

British cruiser tank doctrine was

to:

** The Vickers Medium Mk.II, designed in 1925, was armed with a 47mm anti-tank gun (and as such, were among the best-armed tanks of the time) time, even better than many WWII designs) but only had 8mm of armour. By comparison, the WWI-era Whippet had 18mm. The design was due to the doctrine that the best tool to fight a tank was another tank, and that armour was essentially for defence from small-arms fire (against which it was fitted with machine-guns). The Medium II was designed to replace both the WWI-era medium and heavy tanks, to break through the the enemy line and then exploit the rear, destroying headquarters, artillery parks, etc. while taking prisoners.

prisoners as a precursor to the cruiser tank doctrine. Crucially, it was designed in a time when carriage-mounted anti-tank guns were not yet developed, and later British cruiser tank tanks following the same doctrine was''against'' such weapons tended to fare poorly.

Added: 468

Changed: 1237

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The British ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courageous-class_battlecruiser Courageous]]'' [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courageous-class_battlecruiser -class]] "large light cruisers" of late WWI had battleship-grade main guns (albeit in fairly-small numbers)... and next to no belt or deck armor, in order to maximize speed and minimize draft. They were so lightly armored that the Royal Navy saw them as fairly useless in a fight, as they had absolutely no ability to take a hit from anything heavier than an anti-torpedo-boat gun, and all three were converted into aircraft carriers during or after the war.
* Light tanks by definition are supposed to be very mobile, primarily designed for scouting and exploiting breakthroughs in enemy lines, so they would often give up armour in exchange for greater speed and range. Although many fall under the FragileSpeedster category, several designs (particularly the American M24 Chaffee and M41 Bulldog, as well as the French AMX-13 series) qualify as Glass Cannons, having sufficient armament to tackle heavier armour.[[note]]A few designs, namely a number of WWII French tanks, would invert this completely by being relatively slow {{Stone Wall}}s.[[/note]] A good example would be the British "Crusader" cruiser tank: extremely fast and agile and armoured with the superb 6 pounder 57 mm cannon, which was able to knock out ''any'' German tanks at the desert, but itself vulnerable.
** The American M551 Sheridan (technically an "armoured reconnaissance/airborne assault vehicle") provides a remarkable example of this trope, being poorly armoured but armed with a low-velocity 152mm gun. Put into context, its shells packed almost as much explosive as heavy artillery shells. It could also fire anti-tank missiles, which could theoretically take out any contemporary battle tank, though these were almost never used.

to:

* The British ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courageous-class_battlecruiser Courageous]]'' [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courageous-class_battlecruiser -class]] "large light cruisers" (strictly battlecruisers) of late WWI had battleship-grade main guns (albeit in fairly-small numbers)... and next to no belt or deck armor, in order to maximize speed and minimize draft. They were so lightly armored that the Royal Navy saw them as fairly useless in a fight, as they had absolutely no ability to take a hit from anything heavier than an anti-torpedo-boat gun, and all three were converted into aircraft carriers during or after the war.
* Light tanks by definition are supposed to be very mobile, primarily designed for scouting and exploiting breakthroughs in enemy lines, so they would often give up armour in exchange for greater speed and range. Although many fall under the FragileSpeedster category, several designs (particularly the American M24 Chaffee and M41 Bulldog, as well as the French AMX-13 series) qualify as Glass Cannons, having sufficient armament armour to tackle heavier armour.[[note]]A few designs, namely a number of WWII French tanks, would invert this completely by being relatively slow {{Stone Wall}}s.[[/note]] The Soviet and British "cruiser tanks" of the 1930s and 1940s (which eventually [[LightningBruiser evolved into the Cromwell, Comet, and T-34]]) also placed speed and armament above armour. A good example would be the British "Crusader" cruiser tank: extremely fast and agile and armoured with the superb 6 pounder 57 mm cannon, which was able to knock out ''any'' German tanks at the desert, but itself vulnerable.
vulnerable. By comparison, the [[MightyGlacier Matilda and early models of Churchill]], while far superior to most German tanks, were armed only with a 2-pdr.
** The American M551 Sheridan (technically an "armoured reconnaissance/airborne assault vehicle") provides a remarkable example of this trope, being poorly armoured but Vickers Medium Mk.II, designed in 1925, was armed with a low-velocity 152mm gun. Put into context, its shells packed almost 47mm anti-tank gun (and as much explosive as such, were among the best-armed tanks of the time) but only had 8mm of armour. By comparison, the WWI-era Whippet had 18mm. The design was due to the doctrine that the best tool to fight a tank was another tank, and that armour was essentially for defence from small-arms fire (against which it was fitted with machine-guns). The Medium II was designed to replace both the WWI-era medium and heavy tanks, to break through the the enemy line and then exploit the rear, destroying headquarters, artillery shells. It could also fire anti-tank missiles, which could theoretically take out any contemporary battle tank, though these were almost never used. parks, etc. while taking prisoners.

British cruiser tank doctrine was


Added DiffLines:

** The American M551 Sheridan (technically an "armoured reconnaissance/airborne assault vehicle") provides a remarkable example of this trope, being poorly armoured but armed with a low-velocity 152mm gun. Put into context, its shells packed almost as much explosive as heavy artillery shells. It could also fire anti-tank missiles, which could theoretically take out any contemporary battle tank, though these were almost never used.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''Film/BackToTheFuture'', George is a lanky kid who gets manhandled pretty easily by the much taller and burlier Biff, but when he finally gets serious he one-shots Biff with a single punch.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Some spiders, such as the black widow, brown recluse, and Brazilian wandering spider have venom powerful enough to cripple a human, something at least 100 million times their weight, however, all it takes for a human to kill them is a simple step or swat.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[caption-width-right:306:[[VisualPun Frail, but deadly.]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Aircraft carriers exist to operate aircraft. Anything not related to operating aircraft is usually considered unnecessary, as the embarked aircraft give the carrier the effective ability to spot and engage enemy targets in a radius of several hundred miles or more. That they also tend to be [[MadeOfExplodium crammed full of munitions and volatile aviation fuel]] is just icing on the cake. Taken [[ExaggeratedTrope Up to Eleven]] by Japanese WWII carriers, which had an enormous airplane capacity, but tended to ignite violently on two or three hits, largely because of poor damage control and internal design. They attempted to rectify this with the ''Taiho'', with the design expected to remain able to operate after multiple bomb and torpedo hits. [[EpicFail A single American submarine-launched torpedo caused a fuel vapor explosion that sank her]]. Modern day aircraft try to subvert this by loading them up with the best anti-air and anti-submarine defenses possible, but hold superiority mostly due to just how huge the ship is and how deadly the aircraft and how precise the targeting and sonar systems are.

to:

* Aircraft carriers exist to operate aircraft. Anything not related to operating aircraft is usually considered unnecessary, as the embarked aircraft give the carrier the effective ability to spot and engage enemy targets in a radius of several hundred miles or more. That they also tend to be [[MadeOfExplodium crammed full of munitions and volatile aviation fuel]] is just icing on the cake. Taken [[ExaggeratedTrope Up to Eleven]] by Japanese WWII carriers, which had an enormous airplane capacity, but tended to ignite violently on two or three hits, largely because of poor damage control and internal design. They attempted to rectify this with the ''Taiho'', with the design expected to remain able to operate after multiple bomb and torpedo hits. [[EpicFail A single American submarine-launched torpedo caused a fuel vapor explosion that sank her]]. [[note]]The torpedo hit had cracked an aviation fuel tank due to shock, which caused a build-up of fumes within the forward elevator pit into the hangers. The inexperienced Damage Control teams noticeably failed to spray down the gasoline with foam and were generally ineffective in solving the problem. In an attempt to clear the fumes, the chief damage control officer turned on the ''Taiho's'' ventilation system to full. However, this caused the fumes to spread into the ship as well, where an unknown, errant spark set off the entire ship.[[/note]] Modern day aircraft try to subvert this by loading them up with the best anti-air and anti-submarine defenses possible, but hold superiority mostly due to just how huge the ship is and how deadly the aircraft and how precise the targeting and sonar systems are.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The British ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courageous-class_battlecruiser Courageous]]''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courageous-class_battlecruiser -class]] "large light cruisers" of late WWI had battleship-grade main guns (albeit in fairly-small numbers)... and next to no belt or deck armor, in order to maximize speed and minimize draft. They were so lightly armored that the Royal Navy saw them as fairly useless in a fight, as they had absolutely no ability to take a hit from anything heavier than an anti-torpedo-boat gun, and all three were converted into aircraft carriers during or after the war.

to:

* The British ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courageous-class_battlecruiser Courageous]]''[[https://en.Courageous]]'' [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courageous-class_battlecruiser -class]] "large light cruisers" of late WWI had battleship-grade main guns (albeit in fairly-small numbers)... and next to no belt or deck armor, in order to maximize speed and minimize draft. They were so lightly armored that the Royal Navy saw them as fairly useless in a fight, as they had absolutely no ability to take a hit from anything heavier than an anti-torpedo-boat gun, and all three were converted into aircraft carriers during or after the war.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The British ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courageous-class_battlecruiser Courageous]]''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courageous-class_battlecruiser -class]] "large light cruisers" of late WWI had battleship-grade main guns (albeit in fairly-small numbers)... and next to no belt or deck armor, in order to maximize speed and minimize draft. They were so lightly armored that the Royal Navy saw them as fairly useless in a fight, as they had absolutely no ability to take a hit from anything heavier than an anti-torpedo-boat gun, and all three were converted into aircraft carriers during or after the war.

Top